(01-30-2014, 08:51 PM)zenmaster Wrote:(01-30-2014, 08:34 PM)Fang Wrote: It's like people can't post on an issue that others disagree about without being seen as "lacking acceptance"It's an aspect of the mean Green vMeme. Where there is newly discovered work involved in balancing a certain aspect of self, it's like every situation must be framed in that regard in order to frame catalyst for oneself. Ra Material is not exempt from that framing and so terms are inevitably hijacked and corrupted to suit one's ends. As they said "There are few who will grasp, without significant distortion, that which we communicate through this connection with this mind/body/spirit complex."
An important observation ZM. Disagreement is a healthy, important, and natural part of any interaction with others.
But sometimes things aren't as much as a vMeme issue as they are a simple mis-communication. And it's important to accurate identify mis-communication if indeed it is the root cause, because otherwise, we'll go in circles in interactions with others without understanding all the factors that are involved in interpersonal communication.
Kind of like how you see happen on the forum over and over again - someone posts something using language to refer to a certain idea, and then someone else posts in response with a different understanding based on the same language. For example, in my personal experience, I've used the word "judgment" and the word "mistake" in a significantly different way than others here. It's hard, but I think it's important to be patient when we're using the imperfect medium that is written online communication as we try to discuss things, and that involves not jumping to conclusions (I apologize if I gave that impression). But if you search David Wilcock on this forum, you see some very angry posts about him. He's a person who seems (seem being very operative, although some posts do actually state "he makes me angry") to stir up a lot of emotion. Even if that isn't the case with you Fang.
On the other hand Fang, I think you can appreciate the possibility as to why people may (without further clarification) view you stating that "I'm saying he is a jerk" as a part of your "brutal unsolicited assault" as emotionally charged. However, people do communicate differently, and I believe your clarification when you say you weren't angry or otherwise upset (I wasn't 100% convinced you were "lacking acceptance" to begin with - and I'm writing this post because it seems that your comment probably was directed at my post. But that could be another mis-communication/mis-understanding).
I'm not even suggesting that anyone change what they say or how they say it. I'm only suggesting that it's important to be patient as we communicate, mis-communicate, and try to understand one another.