Who is this David Wilcock guy?

[xise]

Fang - "I'm saying he is a jerk", ZM - "weaselly". These are not statements made form a loving state of being, they can't possibly be thought of as STO thoughts/words, and there are but two choices :¬)

Focusing on labeling actions/words/thoughts as a given polarity I find tends to invite back in judgment (as in judgmental or judgment-condemnation).

What seems to be going on in this thread, at a more basic level, are concepts involving acceptance. I say seem, because this online communication is such a limited form and as they say communication is 80% non-verbal.

That being said, it seems that there is some potential lack of acceptance for David Wilcock (there is a difference between observations with and without emotional charge, but I noticed the same words as Namaste did and to me they seem to imply an emotional charge - likely a lack of acceptance).

Interesting, there seems to be a lack of acceptance by others in this thread of the seemingly lack of acceptance toward DW. If true, it's kind of interesting how that catalyst sometimes isn't so subtle - the same concept is being explored from a multitude of perspectives.

But, without a doubt, everything written in this thread is completely acceptable and as well as quite interesting.