01-29-2014, 07:29 PM
I think it's nice that he is getting some more widespread recognition for the Law of One, but yeah I feel like a lot of what he says is BS.
I read his book The Source Field Investigations a while back and it was kind of a mixed bag. Lots of interesting ideas blown out of proportion and lots of intuitive free-association taken as fact. After reading it I would check his blog sometimes but it was so full of conspiracy mongering and predictions that I just couldn't buy it and made my way here to the slightly saner waters of Bring4th insteaddata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37ded/37dede925edbb07a0b0be7dce69df8547e1883d5" alt="Tongue Tongue"
Basically what I got out of his work was "huh, this guy references the Law of One a lot, maybe I should check that out," which I did and found the LOO to be a much more useful resource.
I read his book The Source Field Investigations a while back and it was kind of a mixed bag. Lots of interesting ideas blown out of proportion and lots of intuitive free-association taken as fact. After reading it I would check his blog sometimes but it was so full of conspiracy mongering and predictions that I just couldn't buy it and made my way here to the slightly saner waters of Bring4th instead
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37ded/37dede925edbb07a0b0be7dce69df8547e1883d5" alt="Tongue Tongue"
Basically what I got out of his work was "huh, this guy references the Law of One a lot, maybe I should check that out," which I did and found the LOO to be a much more useful resource.