01-16-2013, 12:33 AM
(01-15-2013, 11:08 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:They are not transparent in the 3D sense. It's not like the "3D mind, but with transparency" as you are trying to portray. That's like saying God resides on a cloud and using such a premise as an explanation of how God is omniscient. And then logically determining that since we are keeping ourselves below cloud level, we too can not be similarly omniscient.(01-15-2013, 11:03 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Yes, but you are false-framing 4D in order to make a 3D point.
Doesn't the material say that thoughts are transparent in 4D? Maybe I misread.
(01-15-2013, 11:08 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:Your idea of whatever 4D consciousness entails, which you are tying to use as some kind of an example.Quote:You are attempting to contrast 3D condition and behavior with some whimsical fantasy condition and behavior.What is the "whimsical fantasy condition" you have in mind?
(01-15-2013, 11:08 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:As in an inauthentic depiction used as an example to make a point. Since you are not 4D, you are necessarily projecting your desired attributes of "4D" which necessarily fail to support any meaningful concept of transparency in a social condition as it would pertain to 4D.Quote:Your one-way ticket idea is disingenuous.
How so?