11-22-2012, 01:46 PM
(11-22-2012, 01:00 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Well I guess it would be highly relevant! But then comparing the two is irrelevant to a case for reincarnation. They could progress in any order.
The South Node is the pattern of one's past life... DW's past life/South Node is in the sign of Cancer. But I dont think that means DW was Cancer in his past life, but the energy feels Cancerian. This is a consistant energy with EC's Sun in Pisces, but not the same at all. I'm not sure that in itself, the nodes of the moon show present/past life possibility.
Tenet Nosce Wrote:Actually, now that I think about it- wouldn't it actually be more unusual to take two consecutive incarnations in the same sun sign?Why not? This would be rather difficult to research unless past life birthdate were available... I still think the South Node (opposite of North Node) is the point to look at for past life.
Tenet Nosce Wrote:Also, in beginning with the written interpretation I see this:
Quote:First of all, what leaps out at the astrologer is the fact that all five personal planets are in the same signs in both charts.
Um...? No, this does not leap out at all. This person is actually an astrologer?
The chances of two people having the sun within 5 degrees of each other is (if I'm not mistaken) 1 in 32.
The chances of two people having the moon within 1 degree of each other is roughly 1 in 28.
Therefore the chances of these both occurring together is 1 in 896. Hardly a, "remarkable sameness...beyond all chance or 'coincidence'."
Quote:I am not the mathematician I would like to be
ROFL! Yeah, no s***!
lol good points.
This reading was based on the assumption that indeed DW was incarnated as EC... and astrologer is doing synastry (relationship reading) to highlight DW's relationship to EC. Do you see the problem? This is not a reading to verify DW's incarnation as EC but to highlight their relationship to each other based on belief that DW was EC in past life.
Moon conjunct moon tells me nothing but that they probably understand each other emotionally. But that's not significant, as you say, it's 1 in 28.
I use 0-3 degree orbs. If the 4 planets were conjunct within 3 degrees and had similar aspects I'd say it's remarkably similar but nothing to do with 'past life' and 'current life.' This just seems like he's building up a case that he IS EC... why try so hard to establish self as EC?
I'm not attacking DW btw. I'm wondering why he keeps throwing things like this to the public, when most people do not really understand astrology and cannot critically examine whatever he's claiming?