David Wilcock, Daniel, & The Harvest

[reeay]

In trying to find a quote for this post I stumbled upon this article about the sameness of astrology between EC and DW

http://divinecosmos.com/component/content/35?task=view

They do seem similar by the looks of it. Yet they are vastly different when they are analyzed. Here's why:

Firstly, the outer planets are different because they were born in different times (Cayce 1800s, DW 1900s). The inner planets are similar but in different degrees and sometimes different signs. Secondly, even when they both have similar planets-in-signs (e.g. sun in Pisces or Venus in Aquarius or Mars in Sag etc.), the degrees are different. That means how these planets interact with other planets is different (aspects).

What makes a chart unique is the relationship between planets (aspects), not what sign the planet is in or the house it is in. Also, it's the overall picture of the chart that matters, not the parts. The 2 charts are not similar on both points. A person born on the same date, time, and around the general geographical area as DW would have more similarities with DW's chart, than DW's with Cayce's.

This is another case of priming - you present the case as - look this looks similar - and people will look for similarities instead of differences or uniqueness... and support the conclusion of the person priming us.

The fact of the matter is that if I were to interpret both charts, I would come up with a vastly different description.

Both David Wilcocks 'insiders' and the Ra material agree on the point that when you reach 4th density, that you can't gain polarity anymore. David Wilcock describes it more as you can't 'move forward' I think he said, and he was talking about 2012 and alien contact.

Maybe they read Ra and Qu'o transcripts. Lots of new age 'channelers' and researchers do.