Does Ra mention life that lives solely in space?

[Adonai One]

...or is life restricted to planets? What are the implications of a third-density people deciding to start a colony in the middle of space?

[caycegal]

...or is life restricted to planets? What are the implications of a third-density people deciding to start a colony in the middle of space?

Very interesting question!

[zenmaster]

...or is life restricted to planets? What are the implications of a third-density people deciding to start a colony in the middle of space?

"Approximately 32% of stars have planets as you know them while another 6% have some sort of clustering material which upon some densities might be inhabitable."

In other words, even "clustering material" has a limit to what vibrations can be supported.

"78.20 Questioner: Then our particular Logos, when it created Its own particular creation, was at some point far down the evolutionary spiral of the experiment with the significator becoming what it was not and, therefore, I am assuming, was primarily concerned in designing the archetypes in such a way that they would create the acceleration of this polarization. Is this in any way correct?

Ra: I am Ra. We would only comment briefly. It is generally correct. You may fruitfully view each Logos and its design as the Creator experiencing Itself. The seed concept of the significator being a complex introduces two things: firstly, the Creator against Creator in one sub-Logos in what you may call dynamic tension; secondly, the concept of free will, once having been made fuller by its extension into the sub-Logoi known as mind/body/spirit complexes, creates and re-creates and continues to create as a function of its very nature."

A planet is a conscious entity which may function as sub-logos with its inhabitants. That is, it supports ever-emerging patterns of mind i.e. noosphere, akashic, even emotional, etc in a "nurturing" manner.

"49.5 Questioner: Will you expand on the positive and negative magnetic polarizations in general and how it applies to, say, individuals and planets, etc.? I think there is a correlation here, but I’m not sure.

Ra: I am Ra. It is correct that there is a correlation between the energy field of an entity of your nature and planetary bodies, for all material is constructed by means of the dynamic tension of the magnetic field. The lines of force in both cases may be seen to be much like the interweaving spirals of the braided hair. Thus positive and negative wind and interweave forming geometric relationships in the energy fields of both persons, as you would call a mind/body/spirit complex, and planets."

So the planet sort of functions as another entity due to its similar interface with "infinity" and "awareness" of vibration, but has the capability and capacity to retain all inhabitant's (past and present) patterns of thought. Things of like nature tend to form symbiotic relationships, whether or not they are aware of the relationship. The "dynamic-tension" relationship is a consequence of the imbalance between the conscious and unconscious mind. This is important because individuals are not islands - when they grasp in the dark for some info there needs to be something forthcoming - otherwise there is no sharing of notions or heritage. With the formation of the polarized social memory complex, there is still usefulness of planetary feedback because mind is still not completely known to itself.

So I think the answer is, that if 3D desires to progress, the learning environment facilitated by a planet would offer a natural means best suited for that purpose. Without something to record and to draw upon, which 3D-5D must still do unconsciously, culture would have a difficult time developing.

[Confused]

Excellent reply, zenmaster. Thank you. Very informative.

[AnthroHeart]

Without something to record and to draw upon, which 3D-5D must still do unconsciously, culture would have a difficult time developing.

I thought that in 4D there was no unconscious because there is no longer any veil to separate the conscious and unconscious minds. Or is the veil for the subconscious?

[Hototo]

Race of space born creatures that make markings upon asteroids and eat low density nebular gas.

(Edit: Not mentioned in Ra Material but such life could easily form cultures / computers / advanced 6th D complexes)

[Confused]

I thought that in 4D there was no unconscious because there is no longer any veil to separate the conscious and unconscious minds.

Hello, that is a very perceptive observation.

I think your former supposition of there being no unconscious (or subconscious?) would be the more correct one, GW. There is a quote that might back it up.

40.12 Questioner: You mentioned that thoughts of anger now are causing cancer. Can you expand on this mechanism as it is… acts as a catalyst or its complete purpose?

Ra: I am Ra. The fourth density is one of revealed information. Selves are not hidden to self or other-selves. The imbalances or distortions which are of a destructive nature show, therefore, in more obvious ways, the vehicle of the mind/body/spirit complex thus acting as a teaching resource for self revelation. These illnesses such as cancer are correspondingly very amenable to self-healing once the mechanism of the destructive influence has been grasped by the individual.

Ra says revealed information and the not hiding of the self from the self. I take it to mean that the subconscious yields herself in a very transparent way.

[AnthroHeart]

I also remember Ra saying that very little work is done in consciousness in 4D. It is emphatically not the same as 3D.

[zenmaster]

Without something to record and to draw upon, which 3D-5D must still do unconsciously, culture would have a difficult time developing.

I thought that in 4D there was no unconscious because there is no longer any veil to separate the conscious and unconscious minds. Or is the veil for the subconscious?

The "unconscious" to which I'm referring is that which is not actualized of self. In 4D you become conscious of what has already been made conscious, through prior work, which is an extremely unrefined and distorted view of creation. The conscious/unconscious dynamic is what motivates "polarity".