creation

[christine10]

Hi all,

I have a question, even as I sit here reading this for the 5th time Im still unclear about the answer....ok,

Ras explanation of creation is very confusing to me, I think alot of the reason for me is the language barrier,alot of the times I feel like Im reading a tongue twister or other times I feel I got the explanation but then some of the wording throws me off and I second guess myself and Ill try looking for definitions of things and by the time I figure them out Ive forgotten what It was I wondering about in the first place...hehehe....is it just me or does it take some getting use to? Iam very new(6mth) to this and am reading book again (2nd x) have feeling wont be the lastime, alot of info to process but ANYWAYS...sorry for rambling...my question is ........

Is the creation explanation anything like The M - Theory?

Im not sure if its because I watch alot of the history ch program the universe and its in my head or if I do see some reseamblance of it here?

Will somebody please clear this up for me before I go mad....mad I say...haha...I appreciate any help and thanks soooo much for your patient and understanding, I think I may need "The Law of One" book for dummys...hehehehe

---

OMG...wow ok I really am a newbie....so went to Carlas niche and low and behold......THEY DO HAVE THE Law of One FOR DUMMYS....wooohooooo....ok then I will be taken that course....hehehehe!!!

Thanks anyone who still may take the time to answer my question!!

[Sagittarius]

It will start to make more sense as you experience validations of what you have read. I first read the material 2 years ago and every time I read parts of it again I find new levels of understanding. Just reading threads here will help a lot. Check out the subjectivity thread it may be relevant to your question.

[Patrick]

You may find something like this helpful.

The Law of One Study Guide v2 (copyright-free)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/12655236/The-L...y-Guide-v2

[christine10]

It will start to make more sense as you experience validations of what you have read. I first read the material 2 years ago and every time I read parts of it again I find new levels of understanding. Just reading threads here will help a lot. Check out the subjectivity thread it may be relevant to your question.

Thank you very much any advice or direction is much appreciated!!

And I completely agree with you,everyday I find some part that I wasnt sure of yesterday,but today have complete clarity of it, its amazing!!
Infact Ill wake up or just be laying in bed,not even necessarily pondering anything specific and wham something just jars lose and all of asudden things couldnt be more obvious or simplistic, almost like "how could I have missed that in the first place" !!

Its a beautiful thing!!

Thanks again

---

You may find something like this helpful.

The Law of One Study Guide v2 (copyright-free)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/12655236/The-L...y-Guide-v2

Thanks so much for taking the time with me ....really do appreciate it!!

Im going there now!!

---

It will start to make more sense as you experience validations of what you have read. I first read the material 2 years ago and every time I read parts of it again I find new levels of understanding. Just reading threads here will help a lot. Check out the subjectivity thread it may be relevant to your question.

Ok ummmm ...hehehe....whats the subjectivity thread and where do I find it...hahaha

sorry(

[Sagittarius]

http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=5596 link to subjectivity thread.

[Confused]

The Law of One Study Guide v2 (copyright-free)

Patrick, thank you for attaching this great piece of work. I did not know such a thing existed. I scanned a few pages and it is very impressive and helpful. Thanks once again.

[christine10]

You may find something like this helpful.

The Law of One Study Guide v2 (copyright-free)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/12655236/The-L...y-Guide-v2

Oooooo ......THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, Patrick.....muuuuuahhhhhh.....was EXACTLY what I was looking for!!!

Your the GREATEST!!

Thanks

---

http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=5596 link to subjectivity thread.

Thank you very much Sag

---

The Law of One Study Guide v2 (copyright-free)

Patrick, thank you for attaching this great piece of work. I did not know such a thing existed. I scanned a few pages and it is very impressive and helpful. Thanks once again.

I TOTALLY AGREE!!!

[native]

Are you referring to like, session 13 or 27/28?

[christine10]

Are you referring to like, session 13 or 27/28?

Ch.4 The creation of all that is.....I believe thats it!!

Love to hear your opinion!!

Thank you

[anagogy]

Hi all,

I have a question, even as I sit here reading this for the 5th time Im still unclear about the answer....ok,

Ras explanation of creation is very confusing to me, I think alot of the reason for me is the language barrier,alot of the times I feel like Im reading a tongue twister or other times I feel I got the explanation but then some of the wording throws me off and I second guess myself and Ill try looking for definitions of things and by the time I figure them out Ive forgotten what It was I wondering about in the first place...hehehe....is it just me or does it take some getting use to? Iam very new(6mth) to this and am reading book again (2nd x) have feeling wont be the lastime, alot of info to process but ANYWAYS...sorry for rambling...my question is ........

Is the creation explanation anything like The M - Theory?

Not especially.

But that doesn't mean M-theory is wrong, or that Ra's explanation is wrong. One thing to consider is that M-theory is describing physics. Ra has stated that undistorted intelligent infinity cannot be specified by any physics. Once physics has entered the picture you are already describing the simulated reality, not the simulator of said reality (which is fine by the way, if that's what you aim to do).

The condensed version of Ra's version of creation from my perspective is:

1) Undistorted, unpolarized, and unpotentiated intelligent infinity. This has always existed and always will. This is the foundation of all that is. This is the eighth density and true absolute reality.

2) The first distortion of this infinity is free will. And, interestingly enough, this is actually a limitation or distortion of the viewpoint of intelligent infinity (limitation doesn't equal "bad" though, always remember that -- limits are necessary in order to empower creativity). Basically, the creative energy that constitutes intelligent infinity explores all possibilities that attract it in a random outpouring of creative release. It focuses its infinite light. It explores the concept of finity or limitation.

3) This focusing first naturally results in this infinite consciousness becoming self-aware or self-referential. A kinetic focus appears in relation to unpotentiated intelligent infinity. This is the second distortion that constitutes the focusing of infinity into the macrocosmic Self or Logos.

This is a more specific, or less broad, focus than unpotentiated infinity or undistorted unity. It has assumed the limitation called "self" which provides a different set of parameters for expression.

4) The third distortion is this Logos exploring the concept of creation through the use of intelligent energy, sometimes called "light/love" or "love/light".

There are endless combinations or patterns of energy/matter/limitation so this can continue indefinitely within the confines of the illusory distortion/dream/reality. When the illusion has been explored to satisfaction, the inner seeking, or spiritual gravity we might say naturally unfocuses one from the illusion over the course of "time" (in many forms). And we perceive this gradual "broadening" of perspective as the progression through the densities.

[christine10]

Hi all,

I have a question, even as I sit here reading this for the 5th time Im still unclear about the answer....ok,

Ras explanation of creation is very confusing to me, I think alot of the reason for me is the language barrier,alot of the times I feel like Im reading a tongue twister or other times I feel I got the explanation but then some of the wording throws me off and I second guess myself and Ill try looking for definitions of things and by the time I figure them out Ive forgotten what It was I wondering about in the first place...hehehe....is it just me or does it take some getting use to? Iam very new(6mth) to this and am reading book again (2nd x) have feeling wont be the lastime, alot of info to process but ANYWAYS...sorry for rambling...my question is ........

Is the creation explanation anything like The M - Theory?

Not especially.

But that doesn't mean M-theory is wrong, or that Ra's explanation is wrong. One thing to consider is that M-theory is describing physics. Ra has stated that undistorted intelligent infinity cannot be specified by any physics. Once physics has entered the picture you are already describing the simulated reality, not the simulator of said reality (which is fine by the way, if that's what you aim to do).

The condensed version of Ra's version of creation from my perspective is:

1) Undistorted, unpolarized, and unpotentiated intelligent infinity. This has always existed and always will. This is the foundation of all that is. This is the eighth density and true absolute reality.

2) The first distortion of this infinity is free will. And, interestingly enough, this is actually a limitation or distortion of the viewpoint of intelligent infinity (limitation doesn't equal "bad" though, always remember that -- limits are necessary in order to empower creativity). Basically, the creative energy that constitutes intelligent infinity explores all possibilities that attract it in a random outpouring of creative release. It focuses its infinite light. It explores the concept of finity or limitation.

3) This focusing first naturally results in this infinite consciousness becoming self-aware or self-referential. A kinetic focus appears in relation to unpotentiated intelligent infinity. This is the second distortion that constitutes the focusing of infinity into the macrocosmic Self or Logos.

This is a more specific, or less broad, focus than unpotentiated infinity or undistorted unity. It has assumed the limitation called "self" which provides a different set of parameters for expression.

4) The third distortion is this Logos exploring the concept of creation through the use of intelligent energy, sometimes called "light/love" or "love/light".

There are endless combinations or patterns of energy/matter/limitation so this can continue indefinitely within the confines of the illusory distortion/dream/reality. When the illusion has been explored to satisfaction, the inner seeking, or spiritual gravity we might say naturally unfocuses one from the illusion over the course of "time" (in many forms). And we perceive this gradual "broadening" of perspective as the progression through the densities.

Ok I think I got the jest of it or at least now I understand were I went wrong....of course its not like the m theory cause that would imply that physics exsisted before intelligent infinity....is that correct.....Or wait.....nooooo.....grrrrrrr.....whollycreationbatman.....this is maddening.....now I understand why alot of the "beautiful minds" go crazy...hehehehe

Ok ummm I guess Im still having issues with the terminology, the words dont roll off the tongue to easily, like I said tongue twisters....hehehe.....just when I thought I had a grasp on things!!!

I do understand, in a really crude, rough way..I certainly couldnt explain it as eloquently as you......and thanks very much for taking the time to do so I really appreciate it, wish I was wicked smart... damn it... :-/

Well back to the drawing board!!

Ch1

[anagogy]

Ok I think I got the jest of it or at least now I understand were I went wrong....of course its not like the m theory cause that would imply that physics exsisted before intelligent infinity....is that correct.....Or wait.....nooooo.....grrrrrrr.....whollycreationbatman.....this is maddening.....now I understand why alot of the "beautiful minds" go crazy...hehehehe

Ok ummm I guess Im still having issues with the terminology, the words dont roll off the tongue to easily, like I said tongue twisters....hehehe.....just when I thought I had a grasp on things!!!

I do understand, in a really crude, rough way..I certainly couldnt explain it as eloquently as you......and thanks very much for taking the time to do so I really appreciate it, wish I was wicked smart... damn it... :-/

Well back to the drawing board!!

Ch1

Perhaps you could be a little more specific about which parts of the Ra syntax is tripping you up, and we could help you a little more specifically?