Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Sitchin

    Thread: Sitchin


    monopiece (Offline)

    Newbie
    Posts: 2
    Threads: 1
    Joined: Apr 2012
    #1
    09-30-2012, 08:05 AM
    Hi, Sitchin wrote that the Annunaki Marduk was Ra. How does that fit with LOO Ra ?

      •
    anagogy Away

    ἀναγωγή
    Posts: 2,775
    Threads: 42
    Joined: Jun 2009
    #2
    09-30-2012, 02:41 PM (This post was last modified: 09-30-2012, 02:53 PM by anagogy.)
    (09-30-2012, 08:05 AM)monopiece Wrote: Hi, Sitchin wrote that the Annunaki Marduk was Ra. How does that fit with LOO Ra ?

    It's possible that after the initial contact with the social memory complex of Ra, that the Egyptians were visited by other, less honorable, extraterrestrials. Naturally, they would think they were the deities of their religious thought structure. Thus, there is the possibility that other beings pretended to be "Ra", or "Anubis" or "Sobek" or a whole host of other Egyptian deities.

    And it is also possible Sitchin was wrong, of course.

      •
    Conifer16 (Offline)

    You're brilliant! :-)
    Posts: 745
    Threads: 56
    Joined: Feb 2011
    #3
    09-30-2012, 04:53 PM
    Sitchin was talking about Mesopotamia though, right? not Egypt?

      •
    anagogy Away

    ἀναγωγή
    Posts: 2,775
    Threads: 42
    Joined: Jun 2009
    #4
    09-30-2012, 06:51 PM
    (09-30-2012, 04:53 PM)Conifer16 Wrote: Sitchin was talking about Mesopotamia though, right? not Egypt?

    You're probably right. I haven't read Sitchin's work. I was just outlining a possible connection between Sitchin's "Ra" and the Law of One "Ra" who interacted with the Egyptians. Somehow, I get the impression they were, ultimately, not congruent entities.


      •
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #5
    09-30-2012, 08:45 PM
    http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=3557
    http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=2245
    [+] The following 3 members thanked thanked zenmaster for this post:3 members thanked zenmaster for this post
      • Patrick, Aaron, Spaced
    monopiece (Offline)

    Newbie
    Posts: 2
    Threads: 1
    Joined: Apr 2012
    #6
    10-01-2012, 08:22 AM
    (09-30-2012, 04:53 PM)Conifer16 Wrote: Sitchin was talking about Mesopotamia though, right? not Egypt?

    Sitchin writes about both, he writes that Marduk/RA built Giza ? I guess the truth is inside..thanks for your responses, peace

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode