05-18-2014, 10:39 AM
As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.
You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022)
x
05-18-2014, 07:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-18-2014, 07:23 PM by AnthroHeart.)
(05-18-2014, 07:00 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: http://zatma.org/Dharma/zbohy/Literature...01001.html What is your personal view on infinity, GW?
05-18-2014, 09:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-18-2014, 09:11 PM by AnthroHeart.)
I don't think our minds here in 3D can have a comprehension of infinity, because of the veil.
But supposedly we are infinite beings. That makes sense. Ultimately there is unity, and in order to have unity, there must be infinity. Unity is infinity. Personally though, I can only see Creator as Infinite. It's hard to see myself as such. Infinity is timeless. (05-18-2014, 08:50 PM)Confused Wrote: If you've seen the movie, I imagine that as a Logos, I'd view my creation in much the same way as the guy there. Loving it, and finding it curious.
05-19-2014, 06:16 PM
While I don't consider myself a buddhist, I am more into panentheism. I wonder if most followers of the Law of One follow the same philosophy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism (05-19-2014, 06:16 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: While I don't consider myself a buddhist, I am more into panentheism. I wonder if most followers of the Law of One follow the same philosophy. It looks like the basic principles may be in agreement, GW. If It’s Possible, It Happened
05-21-2014, 10:20 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-21-2014, 10:32 AM by AnthroHeart.)
How much larger is grahams number to a googolplex ? https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index...405AAWqL59
05-21-2014, 11:31 AM
(05-21-2014, 10:20 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: How much larger is grahams number to a googolplex ? I find it very interesting, GW, that the person says that if you store information beyond a point, then the brain becomes a black-hole. I do not know whether it was a metaphorical joke. But if not, there again, the connection or link between information and the black-hole!
05-21-2014, 11:40 AM
(05-21-2014, 11:31 AM)Confused Wrote:(05-21-2014, 10:20 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: How much larger is grahams number to a googolplex ? I'm sure we'll all find out in 7D when we're one with everything. I'm sure then that we'll have infinite wisdom. I wonder if knowledge can approach infinity as well. It's a time I can't wait for. If I'm of Ra, I've only got 2.5 million years to go. But that time seems so short compared to this life to me. Life feels drawn out and slow. I wonder if time goes by faster in a higher density.
05-21-2014, 10:00 PM
05-22-2014, 09:52 AM
Perhaps 3D is safer than higher density.
05-22-2014, 11:47 AM
Safer in the sense of less responsibility for your thoughts to create things you don't want. Here, our thoughts really don't manifest immediately. So we can have some rest in our thoughts. Higher density what you think you create. So there's potential for things not wanted.
Earlier I was thinking about personal safety, but then I realized that in that sense 3D isn't really safe at all.
05-22-2014, 08:21 PM
Quote:16.51 Questioner: Could you define the word density as we have been using it to give us a little greater idea of the concept of this term when used by you? (05-22-2014, 11:47 AM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: Safer in the sense of less responsibility for your thoughts to create things you don't want. Here, our thoughts really don't manifest immediately. So we can have some rest in our thoughts. Higher density what you think you create. So there's potential for things not wanted. That makes quite some sense, GW. (05-22-2014, 08:21 PM)Bring4th_Plenum Wrote: It makes me wonder, Plenum. whether the eight note or octave corresponds to a black-hole.
05-24-2014, 05:19 AM
05-24-2014, 11:33 AM
05-24-2014, 01:51 PM
05-24-2014, 10:08 PM
05-25-2014, 11:53 AM
05-25-2014, 06:08 PM
05-26-2014, 10:09 AM
05-26-2014, 09:05 PM
Not continuing to post the BBC series on 'Isaac Newton & Alchemy', further, as I find the ensuing parts not politically correct and may be hurtful to sensitive human sentiments.
Experience of Consciousness -- A tragic, almost farcical, riddle and a sublime symphony, all at once. Beautifully expressed in this scene
05-27-2014, 11:09 PM
(05-25-2014, 11:53 AM)Confused Wrote:(05-24-2014, 10:08 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: I suddenly had the thought that perhaps the sound is not creating the light, but rather creating the environment for the light to become visible. I think this new idea(for me) has come to me now because I have been thinking more and more lately about how everything comes from light. Which would mean sound is an expression of light. So maybe the sound is converting into light? Instead of creating an environment that lets light become visible? I am wondering if it is possible for anything to "Create" light? Maybe when light is "created" it is really just becoming visible to our eyes, and has always been there as "light". If that makes any sense?
05-28-2014, 11:46 AM
(05-27-2014, 11:09 PM)Conifer16 Wrote: I am wondering if it is possible for anything to "Create" light? Very interesting observations and questions, Conifer16. Just wanted to bring the following quotes in here, in terms of taking the ideas forward. Currently, I do not have anything to say, since I do not understand these highly complex areas. However, I think it can be start of a new line of investigation. Quote:28.2 Questioner: Well, we had yesterday arrived at a point where we were considering colors of light. [You] said that “the nature of the vibratory patterns of your universe is dependent upon the configurations placed on the original material or light by the focus of Love using Its intelligent energy to create a certain pattern of… of illusions or densities.” Then after this material you said that there’s further information which you’d be happy to share, but we ran out of time. Could you complete the further information on that? |
|