03-27-2013, 02:29 PM
My pleasure - share the same interests. You may be interested to know of the comments by David Gross (Nobel Laureate) summarizing the consensus of the 2005 Solvay Conference, the four-yearly conclave of the world's leading phsyicists: "We don't know what we're talking about. We're missing something crucial ..." same as back in 1911, he said. In 1912 Rutherford proposed his "solar system" atomic model, and in 1913 Bohr mathematized it.
What they're missing today, of course, is the realization that the whole Universe is a construct of consciousness, and that the whole "game of billiards" thing is finished. A correct understanding of the nature of time, and it's relationship with space, yields a physical theory that has no need of "string theory" or any other such nonsense, hence my recommendation.
What they're missing today, of course, is the realization that the whole Universe is a construct of consciousness, and that the whole "game of billiards" thing is finished. A correct understanding of the nature of time, and it's relationship with space, yields a physical theory that has no need of "string theory" or any other such nonsense, hence my recommendation.