(12-28-2012, 03:30 AM)Xenos Wrote: Reading through sessions again, I have a new sense of awareness swimming through the sea of LOO material.
I remember Hidden Hand saying that the material is about ~95% accurate in data.
Makes me realize that we really have to interpret alot of the meaning and take in what resonates with our vibration.
Just like what hidden hand said...
"follow the message, don't listen to the messenger"
I'm pretty sure some negative entities slipped through the channeling and decided to give us false dates and such? haha
What makes Hidden Hand trustworthy in evaluating the truthfulness of the Ra Material? (or any material?)
(12-28-2012, 04:40 AM)Confused Wrote:(12-28-2012, 03:30 AM)Xenos Wrote: I'm pretty sure some negative entities slipped through the channeling and decided to give us false dates and such? haha
I think extreme care was taken so as to not allow any negative interference. The channeling was in a complete trance state, with Ra being in full control of the content spoken through Carla's vocal conduits. However, Ra did acknowledge an apparent underbelly of the contact --Quote:32.4 Questioner: So I should change that third to fourth?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. Please continue to scan for errors having to do with numberings, as you call them, as this concept is foreign to us and we must translate, if you will, when using numbers. This is an on-going weakness of this contact due to the difference between our ways and yours. Your aid is appreciated.
I wanted to point out that Ra was just saying in this quote that the miscalculation and misrepresentation of numerical statistics was going to be a recurring difficulty within the questioning and answering, due to Ra most likely not having used numbers (quantitative thinking) in the majority of their experience. They were/are unfamiliar with them and probably kept track of time and numerical data in a far different (qualitative) way.