06-17-2020, 12:40 PM
@flofrog, I'm simply looking at patterns related to the big picture. I don't have great in-depth knowledge of structured archetypal teachings. I also try to include a look at things across the relevant densities by considering things in a more abstract technical way.
Don basically seems to have been the research-minded of the original three to such an extent that the basic gap with him gone, in intellectual driving force, still remains. Half the spirit of the group at a human level was concentrated in one of the three. Genuine love remained in his absence, but research was reduced to preservation.
The 6D "role" of the 80's Ra, as a whole, was designed for the group, thus was only suitable as long as a matching group was still there to interact with 6D-as-"Ra". Don's qualities probably determined a lot in terms of the precision shown in the Ra material. Compare to the more diffuse channeling afterwards which includes some 6D inspiration.
The channeling can be thought of as having emerged on one side of a signal processing system, where the other side is 6D STO. How does the processing in-between look, or work, or translate?
6D STO can be understood in part, through what it isn't, for example it cannot have the qualities of a human personality at all. Unity characterizes it, and everything which is more like a person to a human audience is "outside" of that unity in the sense of being smaller than it. Thus, the entire "role" of Ra, played by 6D STO, emerges as part of the processing chain in connection with the lower-density audience.
The nature of the role? It relied to a large extent on what Don provided. The 5D wisdom there is the background, and likely co-ordination at an invisible level, accomplished a lot of what was necessary to have a meaningful communication going at high quality.
But the entire group depended on Don's wisdom, since it became deeply involved in a higher-density drama with full intensity of conflicting currents up to and including the 5D level. So Don had to do and provide a lot which he alone was capable of, among the three, and perhaps it was all stretched too thin.
The way in which the group worked together harmoniously enough may also have been too constrained, too fragmented in consciousness. Too limited by narrow focuses on what was pre-judged to be good topics to discuss and not, and too narrow comfort zones which had to be compensated for with extra ritualistic rigor. The care and concern shown to avoid corruption was very good, but its effectiveness somewhat limited by a tunnel-vision (not looking where needed, instead looking at the other things again and again).
I think that Don could, in principle, have been wiser about the communication with Ra. Then there may have been more exchanges which, in some open-ended way, would basically have consulted Ra for the benefit of the group and its project(s) and overall functioning, while the material we are familiar with would have come along a bit more slowly.
In engineering terms, the system performed great as long as it worked, but it was not stable. It provided the means for debugging the design, at least in principle, but something about how it was running kept that capability from being sufficiently used until it was too late. A longer period of testing and experimentation early on seems the most likely way it could have gone on to have a better future.
Don basically seems to have been the research-minded of the original three to such an extent that the basic gap with him gone, in intellectual driving force, still remains. Half the spirit of the group at a human level was concentrated in one of the three. Genuine love remained in his absence, but research was reduced to preservation.
The 6D "role" of the 80's Ra, as a whole, was designed for the group, thus was only suitable as long as a matching group was still there to interact with 6D-as-"Ra". Don's qualities probably determined a lot in terms of the precision shown in the Ra material. Compare to the more diffuse channeling afterwards which includes some 6D inspiration.
The channeling can be thought of as having emerged on one side of a signal processing system, where the other side is 6D STO. How does the processing in-between look, or work, or translate?
6D STO can be understood in part, through what it isn't, for example it cannot have the qualities of a human personality at all. Unity characterizes it, and everything which is more like a person to a human audience is "outside" of that unity in the sense of being smaller than it. Thus, the entire "role" of Ra, played by 6D STO, emerges as part of the processing chain in connection with the lower-density audience.
The nature of the role? It relied to a large extent on what Don provided. The 5D wisdom there is the background, and likely co-ordination at an invisible level, accomplished a lot of what was necessary to have a meaningful communication going at high quality.
But the entire group depended on Don's wisdom, since it became deeply involved in a higher-density drama with full intensity of conflicting currents up to and including the 5D level. So Don had to do and provide a lot which he alone was capable of, among the three, and perhaps it was all stretched too thin.
The way in which the group worked together harmoniously enough may also have been too constrained, too fragmented in consciousness. Too limited by narrow focuses on what was pre-judged to be good topics to discuss and not, and too narrow comfort zones which had to be compensated for with extra ritualistic rigor. The care and concern shown to avoid corruption was very good, but its effectiveness somewhat limited by a tunnel-vision (not looking where needed, instead looking at the other things again and again).
I think that Don could, in principle, have been wiser about the communication with Ra. Then there may have been more exchanges which, in some open-ended way, would basically have consulted Ra for the benefit of the group and its project(s) and overall functioning, while the material we are familiar with would have come along a bit more slowly.
In engineering terms, the system performed great as long as it worked, but it was not stable. It provided the means for debugging the design, at least in principle, but something about how it was running kept that capability from being sufficiently used until it was too late. A longer period of testing and experimentation early on seems the most likely way it could have gone on to have a better future.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)