03-25-2021, 01:02 PM
(03-25-2021, 12:26 PM)Patrick Wrote:(03-25-2021, 12:06 PM)flofrog Wrote:(03-24-2021, 07:56 AM)Patrick Wrote: it is the sentiments that counts. End of Postscript to myself.
:@ :idea:
Patrick, if it is the sentiment that counts you dont need a quantum computer, you need a Sentiment Computer :idea:
Your quoting is bugged Flo. I did not say that.
But look here, we can have fun with that !
(03-25-2021, 12:06 PM)flofrog Wrote: I really don't like you Patrick !
:@
Flo
Patrick, (my good fellow). I like that, its very condescending. When you have a moment to spare, will you please invent a "Sentiment Computer"? I would prefer it to be on the small size, (but large on memory and computing capacity). Preferably in Terabytes. We need to raise the bar as far as computing is concerned. We are still using outdated technology. How is this, (oh wise one)? We maybe using sixty-four bit computers, (but), it is still based on eight-bit technology, (8-16-32-64). All it is, is eight-bit multiplied by three, and the input is basically is the same. Perhaps we should do away with "1s" and "0s" and find something more efficient, (Efficiency is Productivity). Perhaps, "11s" or "00s". That would double the input of the "Bit". Or, even better still, "1-1s" and "0-0s", creating a separation between the two bits. Is anybody up to experimentation? Anyway Patrick, (my good fellow), go and give it a try and come back when you are finished. Let me know how you are getting on?
:idea: