It's not that I disagree with the basis of what you are saying. But I think I react differently to those same realisations. You seem to be concluding that it is not worthwhile to exchange data because we have been mostly doing it wrong on this planet so far. As if there was no way that such a thing as unbiased data could exist. I have a more optimistic outlook. I even think that some of our current data is provided in a raw enough and open enough format to actually be useful to the experience of a great many people.
But then, let's say we just agree to disagree on that. What is there left for us to communicate? These words are data, we are data. If none of it has value to others because of subjectivity, then what are we doing here? Not just on the subject of this thread, but why have a forum or the Internet?
But then, let's say we just agree to disagree on that. What is there left for us to communicate? These words are data, we are data. If none of it has value to others because of subjectivity, then what are we doing here? Not just on the subject of this thread, but why have a forum or the Internet?