07-27-2021, 08:45 AM
(07-27-2021, 02:57 AM)LeiwoUnion Wrote:(07-26-2021, 10:20 PM)Patrick Wrote: Here is a thought experiment that I would like to ponder with you guys.
Let's say the international community were to come up with a way to fully recognize freedom of choice regarding Covid vaccination.
Something like you can either get a proof of vaccination or a proof that you understood and accepted any consequences of your personal choice to not get vaccinated. Then the QR Code is the same and gives all the same access for stuff like travel. No person checking that code can ever know if you got the vaccine or if you acknowledged responsibilities instead. The only difference is if you ever find yourself in hospital in need of a respirator and there are not enough for everyone, then you already accepted this as a possible risk and cannot really complain.
I wonder if such a type of solution would be acceptable or if the ethical issues would be just as unworkable?
It is unworkable, because it's more about politics and appearances than actual 'solutions' or 'compromises'. A true solution would not even have to be 'loaded' such as this is, it would be obvious and 'Loving' in its core function.
What would a true solution look like then? I am pondering how each "side" sees the other and trying to see what shape a solution would have. I know that a lot of people are starting to simply push for mandatory vaccination because of fear of the unvaccinated. And I also know that many do not even believe the virus exists.
So how do we bridge such a gap in perception? Since All Is Well, this bridge exists and all we need to do is perceive it so we can manifest it.