Are you going to take the vaccine?

[Patrick]

I think the "not knowing" notion was quite relevant to the topic. If everyone could admit to that they ultimately cannot 100% know for sure and that they may be biased in their opinion, then things would probably ease up a little bit.

I think a discussion going on in circles for so long where both sides still have their initial completely categoric stances which lack nuances, makes apparent that the views expressed are not quite balanced. Both sides ultimately are trying to shutdown the opposing perspective, while merely feeding it to grow. From an external perspective, it may look like trying to convince your own self of what you want to believe.

I am not sure that the discussion is executing exactly the same loop this time around.

As you are saying, this time the focus is more directly challenging this notion that we can share absolute Truth with each others while veiled. According to Confederation teachings, which these forums are all about, this is not only impossible, but Ra even told us directly that such a belief is antithesis with harvestability.

So I am starting to believe that addressing this is the thing that might end up bringing back more harmony in the end.

In other words, while everyone can believe whatever they want, the only belief that seems at the crux of a true shutdown in the opposing perspective is this single belief that one may really know and share absolute truth. Hence why we need to go all the way on this one.

Well I do think admitting to not being omniscient can indeed bring about harmony. From there you can give yourself credit to that if you were right, then what you have done is probably useful. But at the same time, you can wonder what if I was wrong? What would be the consequence of it? Admitting to not knowing also means being able to be open to the opposing perspective in actually considering it, if you're just convinced you are right then you are trying to learn for others, which as Ra says is just making yourself both teach/learner and learn/teacher and to not be balanced with our third density.

You are right though that there is probably a usefulness to it all that I was not perceiving.

If I am wrong about my only real belief, then I'll accept all the consequences.

Absolute truthism is the only core belief I am not willing to move on. The rest is built on top of that.

Anyone coming to bring4th and pushing absolute truthism will only create disharmony and distortions.

Absolute truthism is simply incompatible with what these forums stand for.

SO I am not telling others what to believe. They can believe in absolute truthism if they so wish. But it should be understood that these forums are not a good place to operate under this belief.