05-08-2021, 04:23 PM
(05-08-2021, 03:46 PM)Minyatur Wrote: I think the "not knowing" notion was quite relevant to the topic. If everyone could admit to that they ultimately cannot 100% know for sure and that they may be biased in their opinion, then things would probably ease up a little bit.
I think a discussion going on in circles for so long where both sides still have their initial completely categoric stances which lack nuances, makes apparent that the views expressed are not quite balanced. Both sides ultimately are trying to shutdown the opposing perspective, while merely feeding it to grow. From an external perspective, it may look like trying to convince your own self of what you want to believe.
I am not sure that the discussion is executing exactly the same loop this time around.
As you are saying, this time the focus is more directly challenging this notion that we can share absolute Truth with each others while veiled. According to Confederation teachings, which these forums are all about, this is not only impossible, but Ra even told us directly that such a belief is antithesis with harvestability.
So I am starting to believe that addressing this is the thing that might end up bringing back more harmony in the end.
In other words, while everyone can believe whatever they want, the only belief that seems at the crux of a true shutdown in the opposing perspective is this single belief that one may really know and share absolute truth. Hence why we need to go all the way on this one.