02-20-2021, 05:51 AM
Agua is right, there is no scientific consensus, in fact government's demand their medical personnel and scientists follow their mandated orthodoxy otherwise they loose their licenses and careers. No debate is tolerated. That alone fundamentally goes against scientific principals. Science is the new religious politic, instead of just being a process like it's supposed to be.
A quote from a CBC article this week (I'm not linking to the article, the CBC has become trash and frequently does hit pieces like this one, they are not impartial) :
Now before you agree with that, did you realize that doctors are supposed to have the ability to independently practice medicine as they deem fit for their patients? Think about it.
So in the above articles case, the doctors in question are denouncing the lockdowns, something which some health ministers and the WHO admit there is no scientific evidence reason to enact, yet the science community who object are muzzled from participating in or supporting lawfully democratic protest actions. And now you have politicians and industry types (like Angela Merkel) claiming that only 100% vaccination rates (which mean multiple shots every year) will officially end the pandemic status, which is currently in dispute in the science community as well. So you have to ask yourselves, who is running this, and where does it end? All the foreshadowing is there, it's not about science, it's about control. Ironically in Israel you need to carry around papers (vaccination passports....papers please!) to function in society....totally insane. We have learned nothing.
A quote from a CBC article this week (I'm not linking to the article, the CBC has become trash and frequently does hit pieces like this one, they are not impartial) :
Quote:Spokespeople for the College of Physicians and Surgeons of B.C. and the B.C. College of Nurses and Midwives .... added that doctors and nurses are expected to provide advice that is in line with public health orders .....
.... that may lead to discipline or other regulatory action....
.... the college helped develop a position statement from the Federation of Medical Regulatory Authorities of Canada, which clarifies what's expected of doctors when they speak publicly.
"Physicians hold a unique position of trust with the public. They must not make comments or provide advice that encourage the public to act contrary to public health orders and recommendations," the statement says.
Now before you agree with that, did you realize that doctors are supposed to have the ability to independently practice medicine as they deem fit for their patients? Think about it.
So in the above articles case, the doctors in question are denouncing the lockdowns, something which some health ministers and the WHO admit there is no scientific evidence reason to enact, yet the science community who object are muzzled from participating in or supporting lawfully democratic protest actions. And now you have politicians and industry types (like Angela Merkel) claiming that only 100% vaccination rates (which mean multiple shots every year) will officially end the pandemic status, which is currently in dispute in the science community as well. So you have to ask yourselves, who is running this, and where does it end? All the foreshadowing is there, it's not about science, it's about control. Ironically in Israel you need to carry around papers (vaccination passports....papers please!) to function in society....totally insane. We have learned nothing.