02-09-2021, 08:48 PM
(02-09-2021, 07:57 PM)zedro Wrote:(02-09-2021, 07:03 PM)Diana Wrote: I would like to add one point to this conversation that will likely be unpopular. Vaccines, including COVID vaccine (as far as I have read) are tested on animals.
The mRNA vaccines testing (prior to Covid vaccines) were tested on animals, and frequently there was a 100% death rate on reinfection. This is because mRNA vaccines create a strong inflammatory immune response (type 1 microphage) but the natural anti-inflammatory response (type 2 microphages) is suppressed due to the nature of the process, this results in a hyper inflammatory immune response that kills or damages the patient, even from a non-target virus (basically it destroys natural immune function and makes you more susceptible to pathogens). This actually has historically happened with some standard vaccines that were not tested to specific ethnic and age groups, which had disastrous results to those specific groups.
Animal testing was somehow bypassed from normal safety testing protocols for the Phizer mRNA vaccine. At least there was no animal testing data submitted (there's always a chance some testing was internally done and the results suppressed, but given the history of animal testing results they most likely decided to skip that step). Of course you can justify not doing such testing, this is why science is not absolute, but merely a practice where the acceptability of conclusions is from consensus of institutional groups.
All the above can be researched, although some may choose to call it conspiracy theories, it is actually part of the historical record, you just need to find the direct sources. Unfortunately the pharma industry has a wide financial reach, and can afford to influence 3rd party reporting sources.
Just so you know they did not bipass testing for Pfizer’s vaccine, they are running the studies concurrently.
https://www.fiercebiotech.com/research/p...-candidate
I would love a link to your first statement because it sound bizzaro world unscientific. I doesn’t even make sense.
Part of the process of a virus infecting cells is the creation of mRNA so previous vaccines would have just added a step in the immune response, and would require use of the actual virus which then within the body makes mRNA.
Use of mRNA skips the introduction of the actual virus so the first assertation makes zero sense.
A link that explains the process of transcription within the body from DNA to mRNA
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpag...y-6524808/