Ra

[jacobsle]

Hi all.
My name is Jacob.
I just now encountered the Law of One material, so as you may imagine I did not read much of the staff, but it did attract my attention.
I have a very basic question. Is there any connection between the entity Ra that provided all this information and Ra - The God of Sun, in ancient egypt?
Have a blissful day.

[Jim Kent +]

Hi all.
My name is Jacob.
I just now encountered the Law of One material, so as you may imagine I did not read much of the staff, but it did attract my attention.
I have a very basic question. Is there any connection between the entity Ra that provided all this information and Ra - The God of Sun, in ancient egypt?
Have a blissful day.

Hi Jacob, 

The following link to a page on www.lawofone.info should hopefully help:

https://www.lawofone.info/results.php?c=Ra

L & L

Jim

[jacobsle]

Thanks a lot, Jim. It seems I have a lot to learn...

[Highrculling]

//1.3 ▶ Questioner: I’ve heard of the name “Ra” in connection with the Egyptians. Are you connected with that Ra in any way?
Ra: I am Ra. Yes, the connection is congruency. May we elucidate?

Categories: Earth History: Ra’s Work on Earth, Ra: Ra’s Work on Earth//

P.s. don’t forget to eat your veggie, love ya.

[Jim Kent +]

Thanks a lot, Jim. It seems I have a lot to learn...

You're most welcome Jacob! 

When you've the time, check out this post:

http://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=15933

Which should help you digest the material.

Cheers. 

Jim

[jacobsle]

Thanks a lot, Jim. It seems I have a lot to learn...

You're most welcome Jacob! 

When you've the time, check out this post:

http://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=15933

Which should help you digest the material.

Cheers. 

Jim

Thanks Jim. Would you suggest to simply start reading "The Law of One" book series and refer to the glossary you referred me to, or whether there is a better source to start with for a beginner like myself?
Jacob

[Jim Kent +]

Thanks a lot, Jim. It seems I have a lot to learn...

You're most welcome Jacob! 

When you've the time, check out this post:

http://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=15933

Which should help you digest the material.

Cheers. 

Jim

Thanks Jim. Would you suggest to simply start reading "The Law of One" book series and refer to the glossary you referred me to, or whether there is a better source to start with for a beginner like myself?
Jacob

I've been assuming that a complete newbie to the material might find the new expanded Glossary as linked to, to be a great place to start, forgetting that even with a comprehensive explanation of the terminology, the very nature of this terminology, being as obscure as it sometimes is, can be very overwhelming and difficult to absorb... but I'm making many assumptions here so take what I'm saying with your own consideration.

I'd say, give the Glossary a read through, some of it is bound to stick and then refer back to it when you get a bit stuck reading through the material, as I think virtually all of us do.

To read the material here on this forum, go here:

http://bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=25

To download and read later, L/L offer a free pdf here:

http://www.llresearch.org/library/the_ra...ntact.aspx

If you can handle considerable bias and lots of conjecture, mixed with what I've learned through L/L's output, I've written a book of philosophy which merges my own personal philosophy with The Confederation's philosophy, and is intended to, amongst other things, serve as an introduction to said ideas.

Find it free here:

http://www.eternal-unity.org/

Hope this helps, but feel free to inquire further.

L & L

Jim    

[Cyan]

Thanks a lot, Jim. It seems I have a lot to learn...

You're most welcome Jacob! 

When you've the time, check out this post:

http://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=15933

Which should help you digest the material.

Cheers. 

Jim

Thanks Jim. Would you suggest to simply start reading "The Law of One" book series and refer to the glossary you referred me to, or whether there is a better source to start with for a beginner like myself?
Jacob

https://www.lawofone.info/results.php?random=1

The randomizer seems to work for me to generate the informatio I need.

[loostudent]

Wellcome Jacob!

Something about interactions between Ra and the Egyptians from Ra Material:

Thus we emerged, or materialized, in physical-chemical complexes representing as closely as possible our natures, this effort being to appear as brothers and spend a limited amount of time as teachers of the Law of One, for there was an ever-stronger interest in the sun body, and this vibrates in concordance with our particular distortions. (session 23.6)

[Cyan]

Wellcome Jacob!

Something about interactions between Ra and the Egyptians from Ra Material:

Thus we emerged, or materialized, in physical-chemical complexes representing as closely as possible our natures, this effort being to appear as brothers and spend a limited amount of time as teachers of the Law of One, for there was an ever-stronger interest in the sun body, and this vibrates in concordance with our particular distortions. (session 23.6)

I wonder which of these is closer, this:



or



Or



I've always wondered if they walked around looking like angels, balls of light, or a demon horde, they were relatively vaque on the point but somehow golden glowy humans seems most likely.

[unity100]

Vague outline of a person appearing from within a shining light source and possibly with a goldenish hue ring around the way outer perimeter would be more likely.

[Sacred Fool]

In most cases, you see what you want to see or are capable of discerning.

[AnthroHeart]

In most cases, you see what you want to see or are capable of discerning.

So reality can be structurally different between different people?

[Sacred Fool]

In most cases, you see what you want to see or are capable of discerning.

So reality can be structurally different between different people?

I think so.  It's the nature of Maya, separation.  We're all little baby Creators creating our own separate realities.

Basically, we contextualize data into the narratives which we accept as defining our reality.  So, if we expect an ET to look this way or that, we tend to accept or reject what we see, or what someone describes, according to how it conforms with our narrative. 

You see it on these forums everyday.  Someone makes a comment and the next person pulls it out of the previous person's context and puts it in the context of their own narrative--exactly the way I am doing now, and exactly as someone will do to this comment soon enough--and most people end up talking right past one another because they cannot bridge the differences in contextualization or, to borrow your terms, their structures of reality.

And so it goes in the land of the primary energy centers where true convergence or blending of energies does not compute, for the most part.  It's pretty darned exhausting, if you ask me!

 

[Cyan]

Vague outline of a person appearing from within a shining light source and possibly with a goldenish hue ring around the way outer perimeter would be more likely.

So like the first humans in Noah?

[unity100]

Vague outline of a person appearing from within a shining light source and possibly with a goldenish hue ring around the way outer perimeter would be more likely.

So like the first humans in Noah?

From their depictions, the body outline would not be there. Maybe a head, or a vague part of upper body, encased in bright light.