06-04-2018, 04:30 PM
Jocie Wrote:This lie is needed so that polarity is seen as something positive.
Polarisation and choice was planned by Logos.
Jocie Wrote:The baby exists with no right or wrong; it just is. The parents then teach the baby that they are of a religious persuasion. That religious persuasion is a step into separateness. The parents then teach the baby that they are of a certain political stance. One more step into separateness. Had the newborn been taught unity from the beginning, that newborn then faces the Ra-described free will, that being for the baby to eventually make the choice to accept, reject, or ignore the mind/body/spirit complexes about it and ignore the creation itself."
Quote:There are two things especially important in this relationship other than the basic acceptance of the child by the parent. Firstly, the experience of whatever means the parent uses to worship and give thanksgiving to the One Infinite Creator, should if possible be shared with the child entity upon a daily basis, as you would say. Secondly, the compassion of parent to child may well be tempered by the understanding that the child entity shall learn the biases of service to others or service to self from the parental other-self. This is the reason that some discipline is appropriate in the teach/learning. (42.20)