David Wilcock Material?

[JJCarsonian]

What are your thoughts on David Wilcock's material?

Since much of the material in this realm of research cannot be validated, i always look to the person and examine his/her character and intentions. I've seen him on Ancient Aliens and hear him on George Noory but always feel like he's trying to make a profit. Although he may pull from credible sources, i cant discern if his material can be trusted.

[crimson]

I honestly don't consider him a reliable source if we delve in advanced topics. Especially as time went by. But he has many followers. Seems he was able to make a living. But others do as well.

[JJCarsonian]

Thanks buddy, he may have knowledge through his research but im not sure if he's taking the time to discern what is accurate and what is not

[Jade]

Hi John! You can search the forums to see people's thoughts on David that have been posted in the past, he is very thorough catalyst for the yellow-ray sphere!!

https://www.bring4th.org/forums/search.php

[crimson]

Thanks buddy, he may have knowledge through his research but im not sure if he's taking the time to discern what is accurate and what is not

You can just use this type of research as one more resource to add to your own seeking, I suppose.

This is an interesting video by the way although nothing to do with him really but the Philadelphia experiment is mentioned in the material:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGglyC8QEnk

[crimson]

Thanks buddy, he may have knowledge through his research but im not sure if he's taking the time to discern what is accurate and what is not

You can just use this type of research as one more resource to add to your own seeking, I suppose.

This is an interesting video by the way although nothing to do with him really but the Philadelphia experiment is mentioned in the material:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGglyC8QEnk

One more
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoJzt_FR7zc

[JJCarsonian]

Thanks buddy, he may have knowledge through his research but im not sure if he's taking the time to discern what is accurate and what is not

You can just use this type of research as one more resource to add to your own seeking, I suppose.

This is an interesting video by the way although nothing to do with him really but the Philadelphia experiment is mentioned in the material:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGglyC8QEnk

One more
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoJzt_FR7zc

Thank you, i clicked on it and its over an hour long. I will have to listen to it another time, but i will refer back to it.

[Eddie]

I discovered the LOO material because of David Wilcock.  And I'd guess that of the people I've met personally who are aware of the LOO (which is a good many, since I've attended 8 Homecomings), probably 20% of them came to it through David Wilcock.

[JJCarsonian]

I discovered the LOO material because of David Wilcock.  And I'd guess that of the people I've met personally who are aware of the LOO (which is a good many, since I've attended 8 Homecomings), probably 20% of them came to it through David Wilcock.

I've come across LOO many times, but it always weirded me out with the whole "I am Ra" phrase before each answer. I figured it was just another channeler, like the "Channeling Erik" guy, i never know what to think of that guy either.. I didnt really read LOO until someone made a random comment to a comment i wrote. Then i started looking into the background and validity of it. I've come across David Wilcock many times, and i see him on ancient aliens and the BS alarm kept going off in my head. The things he says sometimes is so ridiculous and contradicts other things that he says. He appears to me to be more of a "Conspiracy Theory" type guy than someone who is invested in getting the truth. When trying to figure whether or not to believe someone, i always go back to the character. For example, Don, Jim, and Carla - everything they've done tells me that disseminating the information is more important than anything else to do. This gives me comfort to the purity and honesty of their work.

[crimson]

I've come across LOO many times, but it always weirded me out with the whole "I am Ra" phrase before each answer.

haha, I know exactly what you mean. Took several encounters with the material for me (used bookstores, internet) until I finally paid attention.

[Loud loofah]

Perhaps the one thing "they" are all not permitted to lie about is their name(s); hence the necessity to preface before answering.

[crimson]

Perhaps the one thing "they" are all not permitted to lie about is their name(s); hence the necessity to preface before answering.

The name was to maintain congruence/a relation/ from the past since they were the same late 6th D SMC visiting Egypt at that time (later viewed as creating much karma). Late 6D do not have names per se. But yeah, once I read the material, I realized there was no other way than to start with "I am Ra" due to the nature of the contact.

The congruence is even more striking, when the name 'Ra" has an intimate connection with the sublogos. So from beginning to end, the congruence of the material exists from many angles.

[unity100]

David Wilcock seems to be taking and combining whatever is popular in spiritual literature.

I wouldnt take anything he says for anything.