09-01-2011, 11:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-02-2011, 07:33 PM by Tenet Nosce.)
(09-01-2011, 06:19 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: Tenet, many times in this thread you have stated what I find to be the truth of the subject.
Which statements do you find truthful, and which do you find incoherent? Cause in my mind I am making sense. But I am open to learning that I am simply deluding myself. Wouldn't be the first time.
3DMonkey Wrote:IMO, it is as if you know the answers but are not looking for them in what you are saying/intuiting.
Well... ahem... er... how shall I say this while maintaining full plausible deniability? 3D does not exactly seem native to me. I still stand by the quote. I'm not sure how or where I contradicted it.
3DMonkey Wrote:Do you see?
No! LOL just tell me! I'm directly asking you, so no worries about violating my free will or spoiling the lesson for me. I got catalyst coming out my bazoo...
3DMonkey Wrote:If the onlooker is looking on then they aren't looking inside, which means what they see will be whatever they find acceptable to see.
I am looking inside and outside simultaneously right now. I kind of think I get what you mean, but I am not sure.
3DMonkey Wrote:If the opening is inside, then an onlooker lacks the sufficient awareness.
No. An onlooker who recognizes the opening inside themselves would also recognize the opening inside others, or lack thereof. An onlooker with insufficient awareness sees whatever they want to see, as you indicated above.
Another way of saying this is: you can't play hide-and-seek in fourth density. Nor most other children's games, for that matter. I guess we will have to come up with some "new" ones.
In fourth density, whatever is going on inside an entity is overwhelmingly obvious to any other entities looking on. Unless said entity specifically chooses to create a veil around a portion of their body, in which case it is still overwhelmingly obvious to an onlooker that the veil is present. From there, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what might be lurking behind it.
Quote:Ra: I am Ra. The fourth-density is one of revealed information. Selves are not hidden to self or other-selves. The imbalances or distortions which are of a destructive nature show, therefore, in more obvious ways, the vehicle of the mind/body/spirit complex thus acting as a teaching resource for self revelation. These illnesses such as cancer are correspondingly very amenable to self-healing once the mechanism of the destructive influence has been grasped by the individual.
The very concept of fourth density implies the ability to see "around" and "through" things simultaneously, including bodies. There are countless examples documented from various astral travels demonstrating this.
Moreover, fourth density is a density of variable physicality meaning an entity can have physical body at their whimsy. Now here, now not here. Except for when 3D is active, and 4D entities remain bodiless out of courtesy.
Or except when 4D entities run amok in 3D, posing as gods and enslaving the natives, and forcing them through "religion" to make blood sacrifices so that they may remain physical as an act of rebellion. Now we wouldn't want to relive that again, would we??
Quote:And if we are sitting here trying to determine what the onlookers are going to be looking at, then we are spinning our wheels into a deep rut.
I guess that would all depend on who we conceive ourselves to be, and where we stand in relation to the process. Again, we are like 10-ish people chatting on an obscure message board off in a little corner of the Internet. The fact that we are here/now trying to determine this places us in a very unlikely, and unusual position.
You and I have touched on this before. I don't see anybody here on this forum in any way representative of what I would consider "average" or "normal". Maybe everybody doesn't quite realize it, but we are all a part of this thing called the "Ra material". We are part of the process, still occurring now through us, here on this forum.
If the Ra material is meant to be understood, then it is we who are going to do it. If the Ra material is not meant to be understood, we should all turn off our computers and go watch the game, or Jersey Shore.
3DMonkey Wrote:I have found many of your statements to coincide with my understanding, but then you say something that make me go "huh?" because it is like you didn't look at what you just wrote.
If I am being that incoherent, please point it out. Can you give some examples?