Bigfoot videos / photos / evidence

[zenmaster]

3rd Best Bigfoot video: Marble Mountain Footage July 2000 on a Mountain side near Ft. Jones California. Sasquatch nest/structure is found by 15 hikers which includes some disabled youths. One youth finds nest then incredibly sees Sasquatch on Ridgeline 750+ yards away. Filmed for 3 minutes and 44 seconds. Confirms on most every Morphological point.

MMF is a stunning example of an Adult Male Sasquatch. Its actions of disappointment, despair, frustration, 60% arms show graceful arm movements, an inline step is clearly seen. This is a very Large Sasquatch. Scale is achieved through measurement of the trees, branches by BFRO investigators.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVUPoBGJo1o

#4/65 Hemiplegic Bigfoots filmed in Utah. This is a stunning video because it shows how sasquatch only move when the camera is turned. Both Sasquatch are likely twins and have partial paralysis or CP. Extraordinary Athleticism is shown here. Truly incredible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OA_CleK-UA

Huge Sasquatch on PEI 2005, accidentally filmed by students (Noah Wiley) Is the only known video of a Sasquatch in Quadrupedal motion. shows a human subject and the Sasquatch in the same place, 10 seconds apart. This is a huge Sasquatch 9 or 10 feet tall.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcEcNNcsCHI

[Oceania]

we descended from sasquatch? hahaha

---

is it harmful for bigfoot that people shoot them?

---

marble mt is a guy with a backpack! omg lol

[Eddie]

#5 looks fake to me. The face filmed recently at Baker's Creek in Tennessee looks real to me, though.

[Oceania]

i'm second guessing my backpack debunk. maybe it's a real bigfoot! the backpack might be his arm.

[3DMonkey]

I think its weird that he followed the horizon line down the hill.

[BrownEye]

This one is a match to your #5. It has the exact same forearms. From an area I used to live.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKcrt3J_V...re=related

[zenmaster]

Man films White Bigfoot in Backyard Posted 2/3/10 by Anonymous poster Bobywade. We spent a great deal of time on this authentication. It shows a White Sasquatch twice, once for 1.4 seconds at maybe 50 feet and again at maybe 20 feet. The second clip is unobstructed by branch, so it is very clear. It appears that two people are walking toward it. One with a flashlight and one with a camera. The coned head, brow ridge, tree peeking, high shoulders, nose to nape, long upper lip, hooded nose confirm this very quick but very good video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=847v8UEFz4M

---

Snowshoe Mt Bigfoot Enhanced Loping gate,long arms, coned head. turns and looks at the camera. Great Video!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDdM9uJ4_mI

---

Joe Black quickly films two Sasquatch within 50 feet, one sneering and one observing from tree." 4/30/2010 Scott Carpenter (aka Joe Black) is reviewing last year frame by frame. He just found an absolute gem. As he approaches an island with 30 feet of water, he films a Sasquatch snarling and showing its lips and 2 canines.

But that is not the good part. Scott films a second Auburn Sasquatch and its foot, maybe 35 feet above him. The foot, pad (gray) and all 5 toes are clearly seen. This confirms once again Albert Ostman's account of the pads on their feet.

Also, Special Thanks to Ron Polenz for his good eye!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkNLYLrbiu0

[zenmaster]

Three kids are watched by a BF film it through trees, coned head, sloped shoulders, excellent shot of underside of foot and mid-tarsel hinge.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WktPVoZBAyA

[3DMonkey]

I like the white one at night.

But this one looks kinda real too http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-repor...e-costume/

[Bring4th_Austin]

These are pretty cool, but the guy analyzing them is seeing a whole lot of things I don't. I guess maybe because he watches them so many times he can pick up on the subtleties?

[zenmaster]

But this one looks kinda real too

It looks real detail wise, but doesn't seem to follow the apparently consistent morphology - shoulders too low, hair, nose and eyes wrong.

[3DMonkey]

Joe Black quickly films two Sasquatch within 50 feet, one sneering and one observing from tree." 4/30/2010 Scott Carpenter (aka Joe Black) is reviewing last year frame by frame. He just found an absolute gem. As he approaches an island with 30 feet of water, he films a Sasquatch snarling and showing its lips and 2 canines.

But that is not the good part. Scott films a second Auburn Sasquatch and its foot, maybe 35 feet above him. The foot, pad (gray) and all 5 toes are clearly seen. This confirms once again Albert Ostman's account of the pads on their feet.

Also, Special Thanks to Ron Polenz for his good eye!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkNLYLrbiu0

This is a great video that creates many opinions from me.

The first one, with the teeth, looks transparent. I don't get that.

I could not be a video analyst. Without the yellow lines, I'm clueless.

That micro expression stuff is BS. Did you see him curl his lips in contempt as he told us it was for real?

---

But this one looks kinda real too

It looks real detail wise, but doesn't seem to follow the apparently consistent morphology - shoulders too low, hair, nose and eyes wrong.

uninformed artist, for sure

[zenmaster]

These are pretty cool, but the guy analyzing them is seeing a whole lot of things I don't. I guess maybe because he watches them so many times he can pick up on the subtleties?

I agree. He's often got a lot more info to work with than he is relating, for example from talking to the witnessess themselves. Some of these are obviously a lot more compelling than others. But together they do seem to reinforce a consistent picture of form and behavior. I personally think the Patterson film is genuine.

---

This is a great video that creates many opinions from me.

The first one, with the teeth, looks transparent. I don't get that.

I could not be a video analyst. Without the yellow lines, I'm clueless.

That micro expression stuff is BS. Did you see him curl his lips in contempt as he told us it was for real?

I don't take everything the guy suggests or hypothesizes as an actual explanation for what's in the video either. One thing he does seem to do is to offer a reasoned analysis. And of course he personally talks to these videographers. You can tell he is doing his 'home work' on the subject, and I can respect that work. It's not always easy to do the editing and summarize what can actually be said of the subjects in an informative manner that is helpful to others that may want to learn about it.

[3DMonkey]

One of the more interesting things is the behavior of the camera person. Personally, I know there is a moment of adrenaline in such a situation. I'm not saying that I wouldn't be curious. I would say that a camera would not be in my realm of concentration. My hat's off to them.

[Oceania]

journalists can be anywhere anytime and just focus on getting it on tape!

[Bring4th_Austin]

I personally think the Patterson film is genuine.

I just watched a recent special re-analyzing the Patterson footage, and I'm pretty blown away by what they have found.

It's very doubtful that if someone were trying to pull a hoax in the form of this footage that they would pay attention to detail so closely. Why would they assume that this footage would be poured over 40 years later when video-enhancing technology would allow us to pick out the minute details? The mouth opens, the eyes blink, and all the muscles appropriate for these actions function as they should. If animatronics existed during that time which could exhibit this amount of detail, why would they spend the time and resources to use it to record on grainy 16mm film?

[zenmaster]

I'm not sure skeptics that have looked into the situation would suggest that the filmmakers were the hoaxers. What has been suggested was that they were hoaxed themselves.
I agree, implausible to fake. But it's such a good video, we tend to be incredulous.

[BrownEye]

[3DMonkey]

That is a person, Pickle

[BrownEye]

That is a person, Pickle

Ah, easier to spot fakes in still shots eh?

[zenmaster]

"The History of Man" Here are the results of the two and half year "thought experiment". This is a two hour power point presentation condensed into 19:58 (FB, YT time limit.) You will need to hit pause to read all of the information. It explains Sasquatch's key role in the development of Mankind. Why they are so elusive, and the fossil record. It delves in the Red Ape theory and explains why the current "third chimp theory" is impossible and that man did not come out of Africa. We use 8 of the top 10 videos to explain the Morphology of a Sasquatch, The Great Night Hunter "Homo venandi noctu magnis"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jnc4AmM9IYk

[Oceania]

bigfeet are people too Monkey!

[3DMonkey]

bigfeet are people too Monkey!

Yes. People are people too. Sometimes harmless. Sometimes not.

[zenmaster]

Bigfoot Roger Patterson film-Peter Brooke Analysis
Peter Brooke, Head of Jim Henson Animatronics Department analyses the supposed "hoax" suit scenario.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AbAXZdx6t0

Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Film- Bill Munns Analysis
Bill Munns restoration and analysis of the Roger Patterson film footage as seen on National Geographic channel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex1Zs

[Crown]

So Patterson's bigfoot is real. Cool.

[zenmaster]

[zenmaster]

"In spring 2008, teenagers in a canyon one mile east of Logan, Utah inadvertently taped footage of a Bigfoot hiding behind the trees during the making of a sobe bomb."


Analysis:

[zenmaster]

Apparently, Dr. Melba Ketchum's 'amazing and beautiful and all cutting edge' bigfoot-DNA research results will be available (in some form) immanently. Ketchum's facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Dr-Melba-...73?sk=wall

[zenmaster]

Ketchum's Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/DrMelbaKetchum

Q: Are we still taking samples.
A: Yes, but not for the first paper.

Q: Do Bigfoots exist?
A: Yes

Q: Will the paper be published?
A: I truly believe it will. We have overwhelming evidence.

Q: Do you believe that you have enough evidence to convince the skeptics?
A: I know all fair minded skeptics will understand and believe, however, there will always be some people that nothing we can do will convince.

So hopefully, this will not be all hype and some readily testable and verifiable evidence will be presented. Should make the mainstream, regardless.

---

Photo (trail camera?) released at noon today (CST):

http://txsasquatch.blogspot.com/
Rather clear picture, so it's either real or fake.

[βαθμιαίος]

Photo (trail camera?) released at noon today (CST):

Whoa!