Anthropology stepping in line with Ra material

[Bring4th_Austin]

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2...062111.php

While of course their conclusion on how it happened is different, the time-line matches Ra's: modern humans have been thinking the way we think today for about 80,000 years (I'd say that's close enough to 75,000 eh?)

[unity100]

seems so.

[Raman]

On a somewhat related theme, I was pondering today about how the fossil record seems at times to indicate sudden happenings/destructions on earth's surface.

[zenmaster]

I thought the same thing when I read that.

[βαθμιαίος]

Austin, you were asking in another thread what information Ra had given that wasn't known before 1981. Would this count?

[kycahi]

"For about 100 000 years, there were people who looked like us, but who acted on the basis of cognitive structures in which we would only partially recognise ourselves and which we do not define today as modern behaviour...

"...The technology led to increased social interaction within and across the generations... This social learning contributed to the subsequent development of early modern humans' cognitive ability to express symbolism and abstract thoughts through their material culture, for example in the form of decorated objects."

One might say that they had dual-activated, 2D-3D bodies for a time.

[Ankh]

One might say that they had dual-activated, 2D-3D bodies for a time.

That was an interesting thought... Today these dual activated bodies contains the 4D consciousness, incarnated in 3D bodies intertwined in the 4D bodies, right? But back it was the other way around? Meaning that 2D consciousness incarnated in 3D looking bodies? Because it seems that we had those "3D looking" bodies who contained 2D consciousness? And when 3D consciousness started to incarnate in these, there is no difference in the looks? That brings some confusion. For instance - the body is a product of the mind? How can then a body look the same when 2D consciousness (before the 3D experience) incarnates in it, and when 3D consciousness beginning its experience (in the same body)? And it is the other way around now suddenly?

[Bring4th_Austin]

Austin, you were asking in another thread what information Ra had given that wasn't known before 1981. Would this count?

Sure, I think it would. However I've always been really skeptical of the conclusions that archaeologists, anthropologists, and historians draw based on the facts they have. I used to be an anthropology student until the history came to a point where it all just seemed so contrived and wrong to me.

But this is in line with Ra, which is at least cool and interesting if it isn't validating. If only they would stop laughing at the idea of Atlantis now...

[Oceania]

or 2D bodies were inhabited by 3D souls. it is possible.

[kycahi]

Ankh and Ocean, what I'm inferring at the moment is that they began as a new form of 2D vehicle for a period of time, then began hosting 3D souls.

Now, if I interpret Ra, our 3D vehicles are hosting 4D souls who unconsciously think they are much like everybody else, but perhaps with peculiar new notions subtly emerging sometimes.

Perhaps after the current 3D population is gone, the 4Ders will begin birthing slightly different-looking children over many generations until the All-New, Fully Advanced Model 4D Vehicle has taken over the Earth. :idea: No more "hybrids!"

[particlepopup]

Perhaps after the current 3D population is gone, the 4Ders will begin birthing slightly different-looking children over many generations until the All-New, Fully Advanced Model 4D Vehicle has taken over the Earth. :idea: No more "hybrids!"

Arnt 3d and 4d bodies electrically incompatible, this would suggest a quantum evolutionary step, or an all embracing moment of the physical death, after all without fear of the unknown and a highly peirced veil one would be more than happy to disgard this crude matter.

[βαθμιαίος]

If only they would stop laughing at the idea of Atlantis now...

I think Gobekli Tepe might be evidence supporting Ra's claim that Atlantean survivors landed in Turkey. However, archeology hasn't made the connection yet.

[Bring4th_Austin]

If only they would stop laughing at the idea of Atlantis now...

I think Gobekli Tepe might be evidence supporting Ra's claim that Atlantean survivors landed in Turkey. However, archeology hasn't made the connection yet.

It's funny that they think Gobekli Tepe fits in with their accepted human time-line. Ridiculous!

[βαθμιαίος]

I agree! It's a complete game-changer and they don't want to see that.

[Bring4th_Austin]

Thus I am no longer an anthropology student :p

[3DMonkey]

If only they would stop laughing at the idea of Atlantis now...

I think Gobekli Tepe might be evidence supporting Ra's claim that Atlantean survivors landed in Turkey. However, archeology hasn't made the connection yet.

It's funny that they think Gobekli Tepe fits in with their accepted human time-line. Ridiculous!

I'm unaware. Wanna give me a quick 'need to know' about what you are speaking?

[βαθμιαίος]

Sure. Here are a couple of links:

http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/0.../mann-text
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe