04-17-2011, 06:19 AM
I want to rant....
One's own perspective and understanding need not fit within the framework definition of a declared textbook to be defined as the same damn thing. In reality, one's enlightenment need not be explained in a centralized way to appease an agreed upon textbook terminology. The explanation one gives for their enlightened view can equal an explanation that sounds entirely different because at the core vibration, they can be the same.
In fact, when the textbook becomes a centralized method of discounting our innate abilities, this textbook becomes our own box/prison. At that point, one should toss that textbook in the river and try their damnedest to get out of that box.
We can all mean the exact same thing and say it with completely different descriptions. Allow the discrepancy with acceptance. If we look past the intellect and into the heart of others, we, in turn, seek our heart within. In so doing, we find our essence, our nature, our role, our path, whatever you decide to call it.
One's own perspective and understanding need not fit within the framework definition of a declared textbook to be defined as the same damn thing. In reality, one's enlightenment need not be explained in a centralized way to appease an agreed upon textbook terminology. The explanation one gives for their enlightened view can equal an explanation that sounds entirely different because at the core vibration, they can be the same.
In fact, when the textbook becomes a centralized method of discounting our innate abilities, this textbook becomes our own box/prison. At that point, one should toss that textbook in the river and try their damnedest to get out of that box.
We can all mean the exact same thing and say it with completely different descriptions. Allow the discrepancy with acceptance. If we look past the intellect and into the heart of others, we, in turn, seek our heart within. In so doing, we find our essence, our nature, our role, our path, whatever you decide to call it.