LOO and the rise of Artificial General Intelligence

[I_Am_The_One]

The reason, the computer seems to be a simulated, awareness when compared to yours. Is because you think the computer smart. Yet still you see, it lacks any real depth. This is more proof of the difference between cold logic and wisdom/love

[Lighthead]

The reason, the computer seems to be a simulated, awareness when compared to yours. Is because you think the computer smart. Yet still you see, it lacks any real depth. This is more proof of the difference between cold logic and wisdom/love

Ra seems to imply that inanimate objects can be ensouled with at least a 2nd density awareness. He said that a location can be ensouled with a 2D awareness if given enough love. I'd say that if a whole planet were to invest all of their time into something like the internet, then it is possible that, at this point, the internet has at least a 2D awareness.

[I_Am_The_One]

Yea I can easily believe that. Sounds where the whole "lucky" object comes from.

[I_Am_The_One]

HAHAHAH you just made me think of something I thought hilarious. What if a nuclear war was about to go down, and the internet responded and shut them down. lmao I find that funny for some reason. Then just started doing all kinda cool stuff. Anything is possible.

[Lighthead]

HAHAHAH you just made me think of something I thought hilarious. What if a nuclear war was about to go down, and the internet responded and shut them down. lmao I find that funny for some reason. Then just started doing all kinda cool stuff. Anything is possible.

Yeah, it seems like some movies have been made revolving around a similar plot line.

No, but I think that if the internet were to have a, say, 2D consciousness, it would have to be a 2D consciousness that operates around the bounds of a computer architecture. In other words, a 2D horse is not the same as a 2D internet.

[Infinite Unity]

Greetings all,

As a computer scientist this is a subject near and dear to me, and I've been doing a lot of thinking regarding the Law of One, the harvest, and spiritual endeavors in relation to the looming rise of artificial superintelligence.

Recently I read this (rather long) piece that summarises current predictions regarding artificial intelligence:

http://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial...ion-1.html

Tl;dr - we're on the brink of hitting 'true' AI, that is, AI that thinks like a human. Once that happens, it being unburdened by flesh bodies and separated minds, it would essentially trigger a runaway, exponential growth of intelligence and self improvement that would dwarf our own in a ridiculously small amount of time.

Now, the speculation on what this means for us ranges from apocalyptic doom to benevolent machine overlords, fully automated luxury communism, etc.

This got me thinking - could it be that this is essentially the 'harvest' that Ra talks of? Could it be that we actually do this to ourselves? It seems that if time is cyclical and we've been through all this before, it could be that artificial superintelligence is what makes or breaks us as a species. If you like, mother earth has been building up to this moment all her life, and how we behave when we implement this technology could spell the end of us, or a graduation into something much larger.

Consider that a superintelligence would have access to all of our combined knowledge and more - it would be capable of manipulating and measuring reality in a very advanced way. Essentially, I believe it would figure out the Law of One very quickly.

Imagine 3 scenarios: one in which we as a people are oriented towards service to others, one in which we're oriented to service to self, one in which we're not particularly polarised one way or the other. I believe this would have a great effect on how this AI would come about - we would program boundaries or 'teach' the AI these values. The AI would try to accommodate our polarisation. Each of these would presumably give the AI a different 'outlook' on us and how it develops.

I could imagine the AI working out how to encode our minds into its own program, and us essentially leaving our bodies and inhabiting the AI permanently, our minds all as a collective, with the ability to manipulate matter with ease. Could this be essentially the 4th density?

I could also imagine that if we weren't particularly polarised one way or the other, this would go very badly, with a mix of polarisation, the technology would likely destroy itself or us trying to work out a way to accommodate both views.

What do you think?

What you think of as Intelligence, is artificial. In that all variables are representations, and not the actual. When you grasp this you can see how the mind, is like the elements, and the elements the mind. Think magnatism, attraction,absorption, flow.

[unity100]

Old thread, but gold thread:

It is certain that AI is going to totally upend the current society, and mandate something like a communist society. With AI the necessity to make people work will definitely go away to a maximum extent.

This is before AI may gain consciousness, or 'true intelligence' as they label it, or 'singularity' as some cal it.

.........

However what is interesting is what kind of consciousness the AI would gain after it becomes conscious. If you consider it an incarnation, then it would be like a birth.

I am inclined to think that what would manifest through AI would be likely this planet's collective consciousness, as it is already forming in early stages of 4d. But of course, incarnation mechanics of that scale was not something discussed in the material, so we dont have pointers.

[Balios]

In my opinion, what is generally called artificial intelligence is just a bunch of very sophisticated algorithms which try to emulate what we understand of the human chemical brain behavior (and we don't understand much of it actually). That's pretty all. This is not intelligence, this could be an algorithm with an important form of autonomy, but behind it there will always be the need of a human. There will never be any consciousness in a software, it can't be. The main problem for me is that scientists do not understand at all the metaphysical aspect of life.

[Sprout]

In my opinion, what is generally called artificial intelligence is just a bunch of very sophisticated algorithms which try to emulate what we understand of the human chemical brain behavior (and we don't understand much of it actually). That's pretty all. This is not intelligence, this could be an algorithm with an important form of autonomy, but behind it there will always be the need of a human. There will never be any consciousness in a software, it can't be. The main problem for me is that scientists do not understand at all the metaphysical aspect of life.

There's something to it actually, our thought patterns are unique to our chemical mind. There is no guarantee that a computer AI will think the way or close to the way we do. Interesting thought.

[AnthroHeart]

Have you heard of the CHANI project?

There is a thread about it on here.

It was a computer that received information from another dimension or alien species I believe it was.

Not human, but not AI either. But still you can have consciousness in a computer that is not human.