06-08-2017, 04:38 AM
There are some flaws or inconsistencies in the Ra material, often minor, but one of those that bothered me the most while I was reading the books, was when Ra said third density life began on Earth 75,000 years ago.
The problem is that this contradicts what what was determined by generations of paleontologists, using radiocarbon dating and other well proven techniques to establish that modern human, called Homo sapiens, is at least 200,000 years old. And for a long time, most specialists having studied the DNA divergences of various hominoids fossils believed modern human may have appeared much more earlier, some even hypothesizing an origin around 500,000 years ago.
Today, these paleontologists have been been proven correct, because they were recent Homo sapiens fossil discoveries in Morocco which are around 300,000 years old. And we are clearly dealing here with modern human, anatomically identical to today human, and with an ability to make tools, so clearly bearing all signs of third density consciousness. This is already in Wikipedia:
The article on the Nature website: http://www.nature.com/news/oldest-homo-s...ry-1.22114
Also, the currently earliest human burial sites, found in today Israel, are between 80,000 and 120,000 years old (ok, that's not very precise), and the earliest artistic representations (paintings on rocks in Africa) are from around 100,000 years ago.
I know Ra had a lot of difficulties with our "numbering system" as he called it, but the 75,000 years claim for the beginning of third density cycle on Earth is relatively frequent in the material, so if it was a mistake, it would have been corrected at some point.
So, there is clearly a problem there. Might be a good idea to ask Q'uo about this.
The problem is that this contradicts what what was determined by generations of paleontologists, using radiocarbon dating and other well proven techniques to establish that modern human, called Homo sapiens, is at least 200,000 years old. And for a long time, most specialists having studied the DNA divergences of various hominoids fossils believed modern human may have appeared much more earlier, some even hypothesizing an origin around 500,000 years ago.
Today, these paleontologists have been been proven correct, because they were recent Homo sapiens fossil discoveries in Morocco which are around 300,000 years old. And we are clearly dealing here with modern human, anatomically identical to today human, and with an ability to make tools, so clearly bearing all signs of third density consciousness. This is already in Wikipedia:
Quote:In June 2017, Jean-Jacques Hublin and other scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology reported in Nature that fossils of five humans found at a site in Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, were between 300,000 and 350,000 years old when dated by hi-tech methods. The skulls are almost identical to those of modern humans. Tools found at this site together with those found at other sites throughout Africa indicate that Homo sapiens may have evolved across the whole continent. Hublin commented: "It is not the story of it happening in a rapid way in a 'Garden of Eden' somewhere in Africa. Our view is that it was a more gradual development and it involved the whole continent."
The article on the Nature website: http://www.nature.com/news/oldest-homo-s...ry-1.22114
Also, the currently earliest human burial sites, found in today Israel, are between 80,000 and 120,000 years old (ok, that's not very precise), and the earliest artistic representations (paintings on rocks in Africa) are from around 100,000 years ago.
I know Ra had a lot of difficulties with our "numbering system" as he called it, but the 75,000 years claim for the beginning of third density cycle on Earth is relatively frequent in the material, so if it was a mistake, it would have been corrected at some point.
So, there is clearly a problem there. Might be a good idea to ask Q'uo about this.