My Notes on Ra Law of One Book 1 -S. Mandelker YOUTUBE Class

[Chandlersdad]

https://www.docdroid.net/Z4KecGQ/scott-m...1.pdf.html


Click on the link above to access a PDF file of my notes on Book 1 of Ra Law of One.

I took these notes purely from watching the Scott Mandelker Book 1 Class on YOUTUBE.

I offer this huge PDF file to anyone interested in cliff notes of Scott's lectures on YOUTUBE.

Caveats:
1. I do not own any of the pictures used except 1 of me with my dog (RIP).  I am using them from the internet for MY PERSONAL notes. I just happen to be offering them to you here. If anyone has a problem with them, I will remove them. But this PDF will never be published and is only being shared in case it helps someone else out.
2. I do not claim to have represented the Scott Mandelker Class class correctly. I am rather new to the material and took notes from that perspective. This is also not a transcription. It is simply notes I took on a laptop.
3. I include my own comments in red italic font. Some of my comments are snarky. Nonetheless, I respect the material.

If anyone wonders why I would go through all this bother, bear in mind that I was a technical writer for years. I ROUTINELY CREATE DOCUMENTS LIKE THIS FOR MYSELF! I suppose some day the executor of my will will roll her eyes and dump them all in a trash bin. I enjoy doing this.

Enjoy.

[Aion]

I presume you are actually reading the material alongside this?

[Chandlersdad]

I presume you are actually reading the material alongside this?

I am going to read the books afterwards.

This may seem strange but reflects my study of the Course in Miracles. Since the latter book took so much interpretation by teachers, I relied on them for the firsts go around. Then I read it myself alone. I am doing the same thing here. I did read the Ra books over 20 years ago.

[Aion]

Hmm, well that's fair but it seems to me like you're giving yourself a lot of preconceived ideas based on Scott's thoughts that you will have to reconcile with the actual material. I guess it just seems like putting the cart before the horse but if that's your style all the power to ya.

[Aion]

Either way, it's good to see anyone putting serious consideration in to the concepts.

[Aion]

What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

[Chandlersdad]

What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

Message removed.

[Aion]

What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

DID YOU CLICK ON THE URL TO EVEN LOOK AT IT?

SO FAR 45 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS POST AND NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS CLICKED ON THE DANG URL!!!  WHAT KIND OF SINCERE SPIRITUAL SEEKING IS THAT?  YOU CAN'T EVEN TAKE A FEW SECONDS TO GLANCE AT WHAT I CREATED? YES, I AM YELLING.  :@

Um, I did click on it and browsed through the first dozen or so and beyond, but I am on my mobile which doesn't offer the best set up for reading detailed .PDFs in the first place.

Since you are merely yelling at me I assume you are offended by something I said?

[Aion]

I think lots of your/Scott's thoughts together are beautiful and it is an interesting perspective on the material. I am not familiar with Scott's particular viewpoint but it seems to me to be a more poetic wording of the sometimes overly eloquent expression of Ra.

I also find your commentary to be amusing, you have a sense of humour.

[GentleWanderer]

______

[Chandlersdad]

What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

DID YOU CLICK ON THE URL TO EVEN LOOK AT IT?

SO FAR 45 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS POST AND NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS CLICKED ON THE DANG URL!!!  WHAT KIND OF SINCERE SPIRITUAL SEEKING IS THAT?  YOU CAN'T EVEN TAKE A FEW SECONDS TO GLANCE AT WHAT I CREATED? YES, I AM YELLING.  :@

Um, I did click on it and browsed through the first dozen or so and beyond, but I am on my mobile which doesn't offer the best set up for reading detailed .PDFs in the first place.

Since you are merely yelling at me I assume you are offended by something I said?

No, I was not focusing on you. I should have made a separate post for that tirade. I went to the website hosting the document. They said NO ONE had looked at the document so far. That is why I was annoyed. I am not going for fame and stardom here. I just know that if I saw a post that had a link to a document someone here created, I would eagerly check it out. But maybe the website that hosts it just isn't picking up people checking it out.

[Aion]

Well, I mean, this thread has only been here for 10 hours and at least for me it is only 10am so maaaybe a bit of time is needed? It was likely the hosting site issue though.

[YinYang]

I think it's pretty cool, I would just give Scott Mandelker a miss after the gay thread...

I enjoyed your pics! Where did you find this pic?



I would love to purchase it and blow it up, as a reminder of harvest.

[Chandlersdad]

I've gave a quick look to your text presentation and will read it more, it's a very good job, thumb up ! Is it possible to download it ?

I posted it to a different host website that allows downloading. I corrected my first entry to have that new url. But here it is for you also:

https://www.docdroid.net/Z4KecGQ/scott-m...1.pdf.html

[Chandlersdad]

I think it's pretty cool, I would just give Scott Mandelker a miss after the gay thread...

I enjoyed your pics! Where did you find this pic?



I would love to purchase it and blow it up, as a reminder of harvest.

The way I found it is just to put in a google search for "Harvest pictures".  Or "Bringing in the Harvest". That sort of thing. I do not have a website for the photo. Hopefully, you can find it. But I will attach it here and hopefully that will give you a copy you could blow up by putting it inside a MSWORD document or some other media.

[Chandlersdad]

Well, I mean, this thread has only been here for 10 hours and at least for me it is only 10am so maaaybe a bit of time is needed? It was likely the hosting site issue though.

Stop being so logical.

[hounsic]

I'm looking forward to checking it out when I get home. My slow, old cellphone is to tough to do a lot of reading on. (and I'm at work)

[YinYang]

I found some decidedly funny pics on my Google travels! Lol!



But eventually I found the site. I'll contact the website owners, must be a stock image!

PS. Is that supposed to be a Trinity Matrix move?

[Jade]

What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

DID YOU CLICK ON THE URL TO EVEN LOOK AT IT?

SO FAR 45 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS POST AND NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS CLICKED ON THE DANG URL!!!  WHAT KIND OF SINCERE SPIRITUAL SEEKING IS THAT?  YOU CAN'T EVEN TAKE A FEW SECONDS TO GLANCE AT WHAT I CREATED? YES, I AM YELLING.  :@

Um, I did click on it and browsed through the first dozen or so and beyond, but I am on my mobile which doesn't offer the best set up for reading detailed .PDFs in the first place.

Since you are merely yelling at me I assume you are offended by something I said?

No, I was not focusing on you. I should have made a separate post for that tirade. I went to the website hosting the document. They said NO ONE had looked at the document so far. That is why I was annoyed. I am not going for fame and stardom here. I just know that if I saw a post that had a link to a document someone here created, I would eagerly check it out. But maybe the website that hosts it just isn't picking up people checking it out.

I had clicked it earlier this morning as well and clicked all the way through to the end. I think something is wrong with the hosting site.

[Chandlersdad]

What I do see is that you will through your method arrive at a unique understanding of the material. "Wide is the path, narrow is the gate."

DID YOU CLICK ON THE URL TO EVEN LOOK AT IT?

SO FAR 45 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS POST AND NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS CLICKED ON THE DANG URL!!!  WHAT KIND OF SINCERE SPIRITUAL SEEKING IS THAT?  YOU CAN'T EVEN TAKE A FEW SECONDS TO GLANCE AT WHAT I CREATED? YES, I AM YELLING.  :@

Um, I did click on it and browsed through the first dozen or so and beyond, but I am on my mobile which doesn't offer the best set up for reading detailed .PDFs in the first place.

Since you are merely yelling at me I assume you are offended by something I said?

No, I was not focusing on you. I should have made a separate post for that tirade. I went to the website hosting the document. They said NO ONE had looked at the document so far. That is why I was annoyed. I am not going for fame and stardom here. I just know that if I saw a post that had a link to a document someone here created, I would eagerly check it out. But maybe the website that hosts it just isn't picking up people checking it out.

I had clicked it earlier this morning as well and clicked all the way through to the end. I think something is wrong with the hosting site.

I moved the document to a new site that allows downloading and shows the document in larger 1 page scrolling manner. I changed my first entry here

https://www.docdroid.net/Z4KecGQ/scott-m...1.pdf.html

[Infinite Unity]

I think your doing great. I to enjoy seeing people interested in spirituality, and the deeper nature of all. Keep it up!!!

[Nicholas]

Well blow me over with a feather, Will! 

I was genuinely sad to see you depart from the face book group. A real shame that some folks there decided to question you rather than reach out!

You may not remember but I complemented you on your beautiful smile a few months back 

I will give this a good read when I have more time...

[BlatzAdict]

wow this is a full on study guide, this should be a website in it of itself.

are people who haven't learned Law of One fools? maybe it's not entirely Law of One, it's simply, for the most part people who haven't learned about their chakras, tend to be led by their emotions, rather than being in the driver seat. 

people who haven't done the work to free themselves emotionally, continue to make either themselves or those close to them suffer. is that foolish? yes, but it's not a bad thing, emotional maturity is a learned behavior, and having the opportunity for growth. There's no such thing as a right or a wrong, it's possible to attain sixth density awareness in a third dimensional body, I can see the information flow with how you put down the ideas and then how you try to reconcile the thoughts in red text. I haven't had a chance or the time to look through the whole thing, but so far it's good though I can see where you would benefit from learning specific concepts from others. I would have hoped you put something like that in a forum post as a general question.

I can even understand why Scott would make several monikers about non LOO students as being fools, though it's not said in a way that is meant to be derogatory, it's simply observing the fact that non initiates of any type of spirituality, will not always be working consciously with their emotions. Service to others does not always imply service to the self, since Ra refers to others as other selves it is simply part of the equation. Learning to honestly polarize, is not a selfish act, since it's done with the intention of serving all.

How long did it take you to compile all of this and edit it?

[Chandlersdad]

wow this is a full on study guide, this should be a website in it of itself.

are people who haven't learned Law of One fools? maybe it's not entirely Law of One, it's simply, for the most part people who haven't learned about their chakras, tend to be led by their emotions, rather than being in the driver seat. 

people who haven't done the work to free themselves emotionally, continue to make either themselves or those close to them suffer. is that foolish? yes, but it's not a bad thing, emotional maturity is a learned behavior, and having the opportunity for growth. There's no such thing as a right or a wrong, it's possible to attain sixth density awareness in a third dimensional body, I can see the information flow with how you put down the ideas and then how you try to reconcile the thoughts in red text. I haven't had a chance or the time to look through the whole thing, but so far it's good though I can see where you would benefit from learning specific concepts from others. I would have hoped you put something like that in a forum post as a general question.

I can even understand why Scott would make several monikers about non LOO students as being fools, though it's not said in a way that is meant to be derogatory, it's simply observing the fact that non initiates of any type of spirituality, will not always be working consciously with their emotions. Service to others does not always imply service to the self, since Ra refers to others as other selves it is simply part of the equation. Learning to honestly polarize, is not a selfish act, since it's done with the intention of serving all.

How long did it take you to compile all of this and edit it?

Thanks for the comments. At the top of the document in the blue section with the white print, I do acknowledge that I am a new student. I state that my views may not be accurate and may change in time. So I admit upfront before Session 1 that my comments are not made with the iron clad assurance of certitude with which Scott makes all his comments.

I think the word "fool" is pretty strong. This seems to be the kind of denunciation that all "born again" believers of any faith make about others, which is unnecessarily harsh and condescending. I simply don't like it. Scott is a judgmental guy. We all have traits that could use work. I simply think judgment is one of Scott's issues although he would not see it that way. It is very hard to have your heart open while calling people "fools". If I had to guess, I would say that Scott is heavily leaning towards 5th chakra activation with a much smaller 4th. But it is easy for a youngster like me (in the Ra material) to throw around terminology like that.

Book 1 was made between May and July this year.

Book 2 has been completed but needs proofreading. I will only share it if the reception to Book 1 warrants "releasing" Book 2. This is not an ego thing. I just don't want to bother unless there is an audience for it.

I am working on Book 3 now. Scott is on Session 68. I am back on Session 53.

[YinYang]

Chandlersdad, I'm just curious... this guy really should not be teaching the Ra material, that is plain to see from your document.



I guess I'm just wondering why you are so persistent on sticking to this source, and even distributing it. I just need to add that my inquiry is not a judgement of any kind, it's really in good spirit, I have learned by now that this written medium can make things come across in a way that was not intended at all.

The New Age community has enough self appointed know-at-alls with superiority complexes, so giving them more exposure is just strange to me. Your comments in red reflects your own admittance that the guy should not be teaching, and I guess that's why I have a question mark hanging over my head.

PS. Maybe I'm the one in the wrong, I mean we have seen how many people found LL/Research because of David Wilcock, so maybe the more people "teaching" it, the better... I don't know...

[YinYang]

If he said this, then he's an authoritarian personality teaching the Ra material...

[Chandlersdad]

Chandlersdad, I'm just curious... this guy really should not be teaching the Ra material, that is plain to see from your document.



I guess I'm just wondering why you are so persistent on sticking to this source, and even distributing it. I just need to add that my inquiry is not a judgement of any kind, it's really in good spirit, I have learned by now that this written medium can make things come across in a way that was not intended at all.

The New Age community has enough self appointed know-at-alls with superiority complexes, so giving them more exposure is just strange to me. Your comments in red reflects your own admittance that the guy should not be teaching, and I guess that's why I have a question mark hanging over my head.

PS. Maybe I'm the one in the wrong, I mean we have seen how many people found LL/Research because of David Wilcock, so maybe the more people "teaching" it, the better... I don't know...

I have issues with Scott, which become more apparent in my RED remarks. Book 2 contains such remarks also. Since Scott is a huge part of the Ra LOO community, I wanted to go through his YOUTUBE classes. But I also have downloaded every single document from the L/L Research website and organized them in binders for reading. I have purchased all the books available, including the 18 volume set of Post-RA channeled sessions by Quo and others. I have study guides from various people in print. I just like a cosmopolitan approach.

The one person I cannot stand is David Wilcock since he very much distorts the Ra Material, adding a lot of conspiracy information from other sources, like Corey Goode, that is not in Ra at all and conflicts with it.

Scott may have a very high opinion of himself and a low opinion of everyone else. I can tolerate that just to get his view of the material. But I will never stop at that. He is just one of the pigs in the poke, so to speak.

Note: I have written him numerous times. I have sent him this Book 1. He NEVER responds. Perhaps I am just not as highly evolved as he finds necessary before he partakes of a reply in email.

I hope you will go through the material. I sincerely hoped people would do so at their own leisure and even point out where Scott is wrong. I had this fantasy that people would really get involved in this as a project. But so far that hasn't happened. It is a bit like a movie franchise hoping for a trilogy but having people not interested in the kickoff first movie (I hope this Book 1 is a lot better than the GREEN LANTERN Bomb). I did put a lot of work into this. I even had this fantasy (which shows you how the EGO works on us) that L/L Research might find it interesting and want me to transcribe some of their audio recordings some day). Our EGO is so amusing, especially when the light of day shines upon it.

[Chandlersdad]

If he said this, then he's an authoritarian personality teaching the Ra material...

This may explain that although I find the Ra material fascinating, I felt compelled to add snarky remarks and funny photos to my notes of Scott Mandelker's class. They were perhaps an act or rebellion against an authoritarian personality. I am not really making fun of Ra. it is more a distancing myself from the dogmatic way Scott teaches where what he says is stated with such certitude, as one would find from a right wing Christian fundamentalist preacher in the Bible Belt. Scott seems quite blind to his own 4D blockages. He speaks a lot of love but then he speaks like someone who has very little of it to pass around to humanity.

I do think I am being enriched by his class, but I will supplement it with much other material. I just like the audio class format better than merely reading all day. It is a pity that L/L Research doesn't have someone with the skill and energy to duplicate Scott's efforts on YOUTUBE but with a more doctrinaire viewpoint based on actually being there (Jim). But I doubt they have such resources available. When I was into the Course in Miracles one noted teacher (who was there when all the material was channeled) put out countless DVDs and YOUTUBE lectures on the topic. One YOUTUBE video in my opinion does the work of 100 printed transcripts.

[YinYang]

Okay, everyone must take the approach which they are comfortable with, and if you have found yours, cool!

I hope you will go through the material. I sincerely hoped people would do so at their own leisure and even point out where Scott is wrong. I had this fantasy that people would really get involved in this as a project.

Well, you see, I don't consider him a teacher after the gay thread and now this one, I think he inserts his own erroneous biases and understandings (not to mention prejudices, and-and-and), so I'll be giving it a miss, though I can see that you've put a lot of effort into it, it looks good.

I have gotten burned by authoritarian personalities posing as spiritual teachers, so if I just get a whiff of authoritarianism and superiority, I'm outa there! I guess it's 'once bitten, twice shy' for me.

[Chandlersdad]

Okay, everyone must take the approach which they are comfortable with, and if you have found yours, cool!

I hope you will go through the material. I sincerely hoped people would do so at their own leisure and even point out where Scott is wrong. I had this fantasy that people would really get involved in this as a project.

Well, you see, I don't consider him a teacher after the gay thread and now this one, I think he inserts his own erroneous biases and understandings (not to mention prejudices, and-and-and), so I'll be giving it a miss, though I can see that you've put a lot of effort into it, it looks good.

I have gotten burned by authoritarian personalities posing as spiritual teachers, so if I just get a whiff of authoritarianism and superiority, I'm outa there! I guess it's 'once bitten, twice shy' for me.

Maybe I just need to present this in a new way, such as "The Evil of Scott Mandelker. Read the Juicy Details Here FIRST before it appears on Entertainment Tonight TV"