09-08-2015, 03:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2015, 03:45 PM by rva_jeremy.)
Hey all,
One of the very biggest catalysts in my life is bureaucracy and police. I recently read David Graeber's excellent The Utopia of Rules that attempts a study of bureaucracy from an anthropological point of view. He had many interesting arguments, but one that stuck with me the most is the way bureaucracies can actually be so rational in how they implement rules that they can actually impel you to do stupid things, simply because you're trying so hard to conform to their rules. People get frustrated with navigating phone trees, or finding the right guy at city hall to talk to, or being passed around the support hotline staff for seemingly ridiculous reasons. It's almost as if the bureaucratic modus operandi is to, time and again, favor a mechanistic approach to life and squelch genuine human connection whenever possible. It's easy to say that one should be patient and use the catalyst, but it's really a question of how we process our loss of power and deal with the inhumane and stifling.
Similarly, dealing with police -- after all, most of their time is spent not actually helping or solving crimes but filling out paperwork and conforming to their bureaucratic routine -- can be a source of quite dangerous catalyst. On the one hand, asserting one's rights with cops is frequently an adversarial exercise, and our conception of constitutional liberty all but guarantees this. One must keep silent in order to flex one's 5th amendment right against self-incrimination. One must actively reject a search if they attempt to perform one in order for your 4th amendment rights to hold up in court. There are countless examples I could give that all but demand that one act with a less than harmonious demeanor.
Our vulnerability is what helps us connect with people. What do we do when a situation clearly calls for us to be defensive and "jealous of our rights"? I think I know, but I'm hoping others have some perhaps novel approaches I haven't thought of yet. Especially with police -- bureaucrats can't usually throw you in jail or shoot you in cold blood and get away with it.
Thanks!
One of the very biggest catalysts in my life is bureaucracy and police. I recently read David Graeber's excellent The Utopia of Rules that attempts a study of bureaucracy from an anthropological point of view. He had many interesting arguments, but one that stuck with me the most is the way bureaucracies can actually be so rational in how they implement rules that they can actually impel you to do stupid things, simply because you're trying so hard to conform to their rules. People get frustrated with navigating phone trees, or finding the right guy at city hall to talk to, or being passed around the support hotline staff for seemingly ridiculous reasons. It's almost as if the bureaucratic modus operandi is to, time and again, favor a mechanistic approach to life and squelch genuine human connection whenever possible. It's easy to say that one should be patient and use the catalyst, but it's really a question of how we process our loss of power and deal with the inhumane and stifling.
Similarly, dealing with police -- after all, most of their time is spent not actually helping or solving crimes but filling out paperwork and conforming to their bureaucratic routine -- can be a source of quite dangerous catalyst. On the one hand, asserting one's rights with cops is frequently an adversarial exercise, and our conception of constitutional liberty all but guarantees this. One must keep silent in order to flex one's 5th amendment right against self-incrimination. One must actively reject a search if they attempt to perform one in order for your 4th amendment rights to hold up in court. There are countless examples I could give that all but demand that one act with a less than harmonious demeanor.
Our vulnerability is what helps us connect with people. What do we do when a situation clearly calls for us to be defensive and "jealous of our rights"? I think I know, but I'm hoping others have some perhaps novel approaches I haven't thought of yet. Especially with police -- bureaucrats can't usually throw you in jail or shoot you in cold blood and get away with it.

Thanks!