10-24-2013, 09:00 AM
How many of you are polarized positively or negatively or maybe you are unpolarized?? i want to know
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bf3f/1bf3fbd0afaa7441d659111363cd0016e52d1ef8" alt="Smile Smile"
As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.
You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022)
x
Poll: Are you polarized You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Positively | 18 | 72.00% | |
Negatively | 1 | 4.00% | |
Unpolarized | 6 | 24.00% | |
Total | 25 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
10-24-2013, 09:00 AM
How many of you are polarized positively or negatively or maybe you are unpolarized?? i want to know
![]()
10-24-2013, 11:25 AM
yeah, I think I'm positively polarised (checks polarization meter).
yep, gauge is running accurately. It seems to read 90%+ at the moment. that said, the steampunk engineers drop by every now and then to make sure its connected properly. Otherwise, it would be like running a Radeon 290x graphics card at too high a temp, and overheating (and melting of plastic) is a possibility. Gotta keep a lid on those temps you know. <winks>
10-24-2013, 11:25 AM
Positively polarized. If I had any doubts before the fact of my StO, raising a child has shown me I've reached at least 51%.
10-24-2013, 11:30 AM
(10-24-2013, 11:25 AM)plenum Wrote: Otherwise, it would be like running a Radeon 290x graphics card at too high a temp, and overheating (and melting of plastic) is a possibility. Gotta keep a lid on those temps you know. Lol. Overclocker for life! Running an i7 920 @ 4 Ghz for 4 years now. I wonder who else will understand your comment ![]()
10-24-2013, 11:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-24-2013, 11:35 AM by Adonai One.)
I strive for the most former by accepting all catalyst before me to the best of my ability. I accept the possibility of failure and the lack of control I have over creation. I accept all potentialities.
Failure, loss and death is accepted and loved but may my will make it impossible.
10-24-2013, 02:48 PM
My service is the seeking of the creator.
10-24-2013, 03:02 PM
I am not sure, i help people out i guess and try not to be negative. I wouldn't say i am positive adept or anything who heal the sick. So i guess i go on.
10-24-2013, 03:46 PM
I try my best to do good, but I'm not out volunteering in a soup kitchen every weekend like some people. I sometimes question if I have much polarity at all.
10-24-2013, 05:15 PM
BOTH!
10-24-2013, 05:30 PM
Is this just a light curiosity of yours Kiron?
10-24-2013, 05:40 PM
10-24-2013, 09:03 PM
10-25-2013, 12:00 AM
I guess it would be unpolarized because in unity theres is no polarity.
10-25-2013, 03:25 AM
Yeah I'm polarized.
Like a fox.
10-25-2013, 05:26 AM
10-25-2013, 06:23 AM
Just finished my virgin sacrifices for the day. Must be getting close to that 98% by now...
Bwahahahahaha
10-25-2013, 12:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-25-2013, 12:59 PM by We are God.)
I personally don't think unity is 50/50 positive/negative. I think it's positive. Remember, 6th density is the unity density, and it is within this density that only positive remains. In this state, all is seen as self, thus it is a positive polarization.
Love of self is not negative. Negative is simply when other-self is denied. Does this make sense? Of course, when there is only one polarity there is no longer any polarity, but I still don't think it fits into the 50/50 idea because that assumes duality whereas there is none.
10-25-2013, 01:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-25-2013, 01:08 PM by Adonai One.)
6th-density negative entities exist. They are extremely rare but they exist according to Ra.
There is no polarization. The whole concept is an illusion. Positivity and negativity both are illusions. The choice to reject or accept the other-self are both equal in value in the eyes of complete unity. Just because the negative polarity is a complete inversion of the default nature of things does not make it truly seperate from all.
10-25-2013, 01:47 PM
It has also been said that at some point within sixth density, negative entities must become positive in order to advance. It becomes impossible to continue walking upon the negative path any longer. As I had noted, if only one polarity exists then it is really no polarity, but I can see why the material explains it as only positive after a certain point.
Anyway, I agree with you about the illusory nature of polarization, but what you are saying sounds somewhat like dogma to me. If you were truly balanced, truly beyond polarization, you would no longer have any reason to be incarnate. With all due respect, if there were no more lessons for you, you wouldn't be here.
10-25-2013, 01:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-25-2013, 01:54 PM by Adonai One.)
That's when one wishes to attain the "oversoul" manifestation which is just the last frontier before dissolving into source. I have a hunch that a good majority of 6th-density entities aren't in a hurry to do such except when their desires are completely fulfilled.
As for the latter statement, as far as I'm concerned, the true reason we incarnate and exist is only to fulfill desires and our created purposes, which are infinite. Balancing and lessons are merely a side effect.
10-25-2013, 02:11 PM
I am sure they would stick around so they can fulfill the rest of their desires, but at some point, their spiritual mass would become so great that there would be nothing left for them to do but manifest the over-soul and dissolve.
If their desires aren't completely fulfilled, then they are still within the illusion. If you are here, then you have desires which aren't yet fulfilled, meaning you're still operating from within the illusion.
10-25-2013, 02:18 PM
I think people are confusing polarity a little bit... everyone talks about polarity in terms of "opposites of creation", but I thought polarity is a vehicle so that work can be done in consciousness. Thus, it is "illusory", yet it appears in every single octave, so if it is meant to just be ignored why would more than half the densities of the octave exist with polarity?
I thought in THIS octave polarity is in the nature of service exploration interaction between self and other self as the Creator. Therefore, the "work" done in this octave in regards to polarity is related to the concept of service from one to the one. In the previous octave the polarity was based on a different kind of interaction between self and other self, that is, the "mover and the moved". This was an entire octave which included polarity, in a different format from the polarity in this octave. Ra has expressed that the same is true for all octaves. That being said, if there is a progression or series of octaves, but the whole point was to ignore polarity, then why would polarity actually be the vehicle of interaction within a polarity? It doesn't really make sense to me to avoid the concept, or to attempt to diminish it in terms of its relevance. Consider the entities that "completed" the previous octave and the consciousness that was input in to this octave with the data from the previous octave. All of that consciousness once again coalesced in to unity, and then polarized again! If polarity is so apparently "empty" and "meaningless" then why is the Creator using it as a vehicle for exploration in consciousness? Also, if you want to consider that the octaves may actually be parallel rather than a progression, couldn't we consider a progression and refinement of interactions through polarity? What about the difference in the function of polarity between each octaves makes it a meaningful vehicle for exploration? Why would the Creator keep coming back to it if it wasn't useful? That being said, I have chosen, consciously, the positive polarity and each day I more and more refine that choice and build upon the foundation of that choice. Yes, I have tempations and yes sometimes I am negative, but my CHOICE is positivity. At least, this time around through the octave. I have already walked the negative path, and then I came back as a wanderer to repolarize to completely explore the other path so that way I will have a complete view of both. This process, I believe, is to make me capable of understanding the balance in creation between yin and yang. Once I have refined and mastered the experience of polarity through service, having already done the negative and now exploring positive, I will be ready to explore the next octave of polarity which I believe will be the next phase of refinement of creative free will that will use the basis of my explorations as the Creator in this octave and all previous to propel consciousness onwards in to infinity. I also believe we are now in the Third octave of this octave of octaves, so there is still lots of polarity to work with! I consider the rejoining with unity to be a reinvigoration of consciousness like in the way energy is re-energized as it moves through a clear chakra or vortex. It is a point of rejuvenation and peace before the next span of experiences is explored. What I believe most here are truly seeking is the "Octave of Octaves", the "end" of the series of octaves where unity and polarity co-exist in perfect balance. In the last octave of this octave series there is a total state of continuous completion whereby unity and polarity equate to eachother. I believe the process of the octaves is the work of consciousness solving the "equation" of unity equalling polarity. Once this octave is complete, one may continue to progress in to other octaves which may not even use polarity, or if they do it may not be dualistic. Just my thoughts on the matter!
10-25-2013, 02:33 PM
It seems most people here are positively polarized. Pleased to meet you all.
Tanner, your theory on polarity equaling unity in a higher Octave sounds intriguing. Yes, I think that duality goes away in a higher Octave. I can't imagine Creator desiring to re-experience that which has already been known. There is so much more to know and experience.
10-25-2013, 03:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-25-2013, 03:39 PM by Adonai One.)
Polarity only exists as a concept when catalyst and parts of the universe can be unaccepted and free will can be denied. The paradox and illusion comes in when that all of this potential is within our macrocosmic free will. All is truly united and "positive" in the end.
10-25-2013, 03:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-25-2013, 03:43 PM by AnthroHeart.)
So the higher self accepts all? Or is it the Totality that accepts all?
10-25-2013, 03:43 PM
What does lack of acceptance and denial of free will have to do with polarity?
What is the real difference between free will and lack of free will? What is the difference between the will of the individual and the will of intelligent infinity?
10-25-2013, 03:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-25-2013, 03:57 PM by Adonai One.)
What else is polarity? Just feel-good morality? Just hand-outs?
You can only polarize negatively by successfully subverting the will of others/things and putting it under your reign, with some exceptions. Inversely, positive polarity is attained by uniting with the will of others. One becomes one with all by embracing the will of all. The lack of free will is only defined by more and more unity with all. To the last question, there is no difference. (10-25-2013, 03:43 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: So the higher self accepts all? Or is it the Totality that accepts all? Accepts things as far as resistances in regards to wishing to guide, if you consider the higher self a true entity. True total acceptance of all entails dissolution into all things.
10-25-2013, 03:59 PM
If we begin to accept more things, and work towards accepting all that we are able to, will this cut short our incarnation, because we have learned the lessons we needed to learn. What if we wish for our incarnation to be shorter rather than say 90 years, is acceptance of everything a good way to do that? Will we depart once we learn all our lessons?
10-25-2013, 04:01 PM
(10-25-2013, 03:59 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: If we begin to accept more things, and work towards accepting all that we are able to, will this cut short our incarnation, because we have learned the lessons we needed to learn. What if we wish for our incarnation to be shorter rather than say 90 years, is acceptance of everything a good way to do that? Will we depart once we learn all our lessons? It doesn't work like that, Gemini. Our incarnations parameters are set by many factors that may or may not include such a paradigm. Basically, mostly no. There's a chance it may work like that for some entities. |
|