Past lives are weird...

[AnthroHeart]

So, any proposed methods of objective verification of a past life? What do you all think is the practical purpose of examining past lives?

I'm not sure. Knowing my past life as faintly as I do has not changed much in my path of seeking. It does not matter to me who I've been, unless it was a wolfy anthro. That would thrill me if I knew it were certain. But I have no objective proof of either. Who knows, it could be possible within infinity. What wolfy anthros have to say becomes very important for me to hear.

[GentleReckoning]

Another thing to throw fuel to the flames of grandiosity... all of the individuals here have a particular clarity of seeking to have found AND be a part of the Ra contact. Is it so far fetched to think that historically recognized philosophers, artists, and poets would be irresistibly drawn to this material and site?

[AnthroHeart]

I'm not sure if my mom would get this site. I haven't told her about it. Because some of the things I have said I've put my foot in my mouth, and wouldn't want to upset her.

[zenmaster]

In conclusion, one need not be objective about "everything", but it is important to be objective about our own imbalances, desire for learning, and potential for learning, in all aspects of our lives.

And where does this objectivity come from?

---

Is it so far fetched to think that historically recognized philosophers, artists, and poets would be irresistibly drawn to this material and site?

Is it so far fetched to think that historically recognized philosophers, artists, and poets would not be irresistibly drawn to this material and site?

[Sagittarius]

Is it so far fetched to recognize that we are the recognized philosophers, artists and poets?

[zenmaster]

Amazing how many of these responses are oriented around proof.

[Unbound]

What is more important than proof?

[Sagittarius]

What is more important than proof?

Vulnerability .

---

Amazing how many of these responses are oriented around proof.

We do like trying to prove ourselves don't we hehe. Our limb will disprove our proving.

[Brittany]

Is it so far fetched to think that you recognize that you don't recognize the recognizable recognized? Akjnjkjbsdfbklfdkjhvgjsdlkhasfjldgdf
:p

[zenmaster]

I am just confused, would famous people just not reincarnate? Aha

What you are confused about is the merely possible always being the actual case because you want it to be so. Aha

No I am confused because the "merely possible" is frequently discounted because it is "merely possible". Why is the finger always pointed towards grandiose seeking suggesting every such individual has some ego void to fill? Why are the unlikely situations always scoffed at?

---

I just don't understand how exactly people external to the individual can claim an individual is running off of "ego desire" without actually just projecting their own ego.

And why are you not simply projecting your own ego?

How exactly could one know whether or not another is genuinely in the truth of themselves?

And why would that matter one iota either way? If they are "in truth of themselves, why would that matter? If they are not in truth of themselves, why would that matter? You can "be in the truth of yourself" and think you have been, are, and will be anything and everything. The people of Maldek were "in the truth of themselves" when they destroyed their world. yay.

[Sagittarius]

I am just confused, would famous people just not reincarnate? Aha

What you are confused about is the merely possible always being the actual case because you want it to be so. Aha

No I am confused because the "merely possible" is frequently discounted because it is "merely possible". Why is the finger always pointed towards grandiose seeking suggesting every such individual has some ego void to fill? Why are the unlikely situations always scoffed at?

---

I just don't understand how exactly people external to the individual can claim an individual is running off of "ego desire" without actually just projecting their own ego.

And why are you not simply projecting your own ego?

How exactly could one know whether or not another is genuinely in the truth of themselves?

And why would that matter one iota either way? If they are "in truth of themselves, why would that matter? If they are not in truth of themselves, why would that matter? You can "be in the truth of yourself" and think you have been, are, and will be anything and everything. The people of Maldek were "in the truth of themselves" when they destroyed their world. yay.

Swish.............

[Unbound]

Of course I am projecting my ego, that is obvious, but what is your point?

So, please, tell me, what does matter? I have read many of your posts and I have tried to understand your point of view but I admit that I am often at a loss. I am genuinely curious to know what you see to be of importance?

[Sagittarius]

Of course I am projecting my ego, that is obvious, but what is your point?

So, please, tell me, what does matter? I have read many of your posts and I have tried to understand your point of view but I admit that I am often at a loss. I am genuinely curious to know what you see to be of importance?

The question is what you see of importance. He teaches himself by communicating with you. It's hard to learn the new language, just takes some balls.

[zenmaster]

Of course I am projecting my ego, that is obvious, but what is your point?

Reducing other's opinions to ego projection, for one.

I am genuinely curious to know what you see to be of importance?

Important with regards to what?

[Sagittarius]

Hmmm what to type within my typing hmmmmmhmmmm. Gotta decide !!!!

[zenmaster]

The question is what you see of importance.

Not as simple as that. First off what you post presumably would be thought to be of importance, right? If not, then what good do you think you're doing. If so, then the answer should be right there.

[Sagittarius]

The question is what you see of importance.

Not as simple as that. First off what you post presumably would be thought to be of importance, right? If not, then what good do you think you're doing. If so, then the answer should be right there.

I feel like I don't need to type, the desire to type is still there though. Maybe not for much longer. I'am almost in the dark. Perhaps recognize is a better word then see because we are blind hehe. The sense. I seam to think symbolical rhyming will help myself hehehe.

[Unbound]

Of course I am projecting my ego, that is obvious, but what is your point?

Reducing other's opinions to ego projection, for one.

I am genuinely curious to know what you see to be of importance?

Important with regards to what?

You got me, I don't know, I have no point.

[Adonai One]

[Sagittarius]

Of course I am projecting my ego, that is obvious, but what is your point?

Reducing other's opinions to ego projection, for one.

I am genuinely curious to know what you see to be of importance?

Important with regards to what?

You got me, I don't know, I have no point.

Only the points of those sharp teeth of yours. There did it again, someone just shoot me please.

---

Trying to fill the hole with words.

[Unbound]

You could fill it with popcorn.

[Sagittarius]

Yes words and dicks don't seam to cut it. I'am more.

[Brittany]

This thread makes my head full of wat.

[GentleReckoning]

My ego made me do it.

---

Is it so far fetched to think that historically recognized philosophers, artists, and poets would be irresistibly drawn to this material and site?

Is it so far fetched to think that historically recognized philosophers, artists, and poets would not be irresistibly drawn to this material and site?

No.

I simply assume that any scientific minded people are actually out doing things.

[Sagittarius]

This thread makes my head full of wat.

Beautiful isn't it. Water. Blossoming air head .

---

My ego made me do it.

---

Is it so far fetched to think that historically recognized philosophers, artists, and poets would be irresistibly drawn to this material and site?

Is it so far fetched to think that historically recognized philosophers, artists, and poets would not be irresistibly drawn to this material and site?

No.

I simply assume that any scientific minded people are actually out doing things.

What are these things and these doings ?

[GentleReckoning]

This thread makes my head full of wat.

Beautiful isn't it. Water. Blossoming air head .

---

My ego made me do it.

---

Is it so far fetched to think that historically recognized philosophers, artists, and poets would be irresistibly drawn to this material and site?

Is it so far fetched to think that historically recognized philosophers, artists, and poets would not be irresistibly drawn to this material and site?

No.

I simply assume that any scientific minded people are actually out doing things.

What are these things and these doings ?

If I had incarnated to make science, I assume I would be making science. I liberally apply this presumptuous assumption to all others incarnate today. It is after all the church of the status quo.

[Sagittarius]

If I had incarnated to make science, I assume I would be making science. I liberally apply this presumptuous assumption to all others incarnate today. It is after all my church of the status quo.

Your welcome .

[Brittany]

[michael430]

[deleted]

[Adonai One]

Thanks for the recommendation. I'll have to watch it. The fact is I absolutely knew squat about this guy before I was told I was him.

Looking at his decadent avant-garde tastes in art... aestheticism.. I never had a name for my tastes and his passions put a name on it.