(i) “You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One.” Ra, 1.6, http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?c=Law+Of+One
Suppositions:
(1) Every thing is either partially or fully compromised of love
(2) However, even for things partially compromised of love, the love portion is infinite and not fixed
(3) Any thing, any emotion, any event, any situation contains infinity, and specifically infinite love. However similar to mathematics, not all infinites are of the same size (http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/...g_Infinity) )(as an aside I think countable and noncountable infinities also is involved in all of this but I’m not sure how yet and I’ll leave it to another day)
(4) Those that have chosen the service to others path have chosen to explore the larger love infinites, and the smaller fear infinites (love/fear are interrelated)
(5) Those that have chosen the service to self have chosen to explore the larger fear infinities, and the smaller love infinites
The way I put this into a more thinkable framework is try to think all the reasons you love something easily lovable and then try to think of all the reasons you can find love in something hard to love, let’s say for the purposes of this mental exercise:
(1) Easily lovable: Let’s say your spirit guide
(2) Hard to love: Let’s say Adolf Hitler
Obviously, we're not using actions, we're using people, but baby steps as I explain these infinities (since ultimately it was the discussion about loving "actions" - not people- that brought up much of the discussion between myself and Adonai - because for some reason I myself found it much easier to love other selves in their entirety than purely actions such as murder). I propose that the list of reasons to love each is infinite. However, it is harder and takes longer to find each reason with respect to Hitler as opposed to your spirit guide – that is another way I conceptualize that the infinites are of different sizes. Another way also to think of it is that the reasons to love both are infinite, but the reasons to love your spirit guide are more varied, whereas the reasons to love Hitler are more nuanced – I believe this also corresponds somewhat to mathematical exploration of infinites of different sizes.
To put this into more practice in the same "action-only" examples I used earlier in this thread, recall that I could find reasons to love murder, in three basic categories (1) aid in balancing the unbalanced individual (2) aid in service to self polarization (3) aid in learning about love/forgiveness for the victim. I could come up with an infinite number of permutations of those three basic lessons – I could imagine and infinite amount of unique scenarios where those three things after a murder could come into play. Thus, in that actual sense, there is an infinite amount of love, even in that moment. Perhaps the infinite is smaller than the love involved in say the birth of a child (where one could easily come up with more than three broad categories of why to love it, and then infinitely subdivide each category with specific examples as well), but it is infinite nonetheless.
I got started thinking about this theory when I started examining my own theories about how timelines are always infinite, but there are portions which may be more or less fixed. For example, many of us have things so unchangeable in our life with the current technology that the only way for our reality to change is to have some sort of improbable event – for example – I truly believe that our consciousness in other realities are exploring different paths, and in one reality I am a dictator, another a saint. However, let’s consider the reality of me becoming a dictator. It is possible for me to enter a timeline where I become a dictator, but I’m 32, so that timeline would have involved me becoming a dictator at 32 or later (barring an improbably technology like timetravel). There are still an infinite amount of ways or timelines that I could become a dictator at the age of 32 or older, but that infinity set is smaller than the infinite possibilities of me becoming a dictator from age 1.
Thus in conclusion, I can say in a sense, I love every situation, in its entirety, because every thing contains infinite love, but I can still rationally decide or prefer the situations that involves the larger infinity of love. At least, that makes sense to my rather recently awakened and ever immature 3d mind. Perhaps this creates a hierarchy of infinities, which smacks of some service to self ranking, I don’t know. But theoretically and practically speaking, you can always find endless reasons to love, but sometimes finding those reasons are of a more narrow (yet infinite) scope in some situations, rather than others. Perhaps once you join with unity, all of the seemingly different sizes of infinities will resolve themselves, I do not know. Did I mention that I can’t wait for the end of 5d??
Mad kudos to whomever had the patience to read through these random musings! okokokok time to move back to the heart already!!!
Suppositions:
(1) Every thing is either partially or fully compromised of love
(2) However, even for things partially compromised of love, the love portion is infinite and not fixed
(3) Any thing, any emotion, any event, any situation contains infinity, and specifically infinite love. However similar to mathematics, not all infinites are of the same size (http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/...g_Infinity) )(as an aside I think countable and noncountable infinities also is involved in all of this but I’m not sure how yet and I’ll leave it to another day)
(4) Those that have chosen the service to others path have chosen to explore the larger love infinites, and the smaller fear infinites (love/fear are interrelated)
(5) Those that have chosen the service to self have chosen to explore the larger fear infinities, and the smaller love infinites
The way I put this into a more thinkable framework is try to think all the reasons you love something easily lovable and then try to think of all the reasons you can find love in something hard to love, let’s say for the purposes of this mental exercise:
(1) Easily lovable: Let’s say your spirit guide
(2) Hard to love: Let’s say Adolf Hitler
Obviously, we're not using actions, we're using people, but baby steps as I explain these infinities (since ultimately it was the discussion about loving "actions" - not people- that brought up much of the discussion between myself and Adonai - because for some reason I myself found it much easier to love other selves in their entirety than purely actions such as murder). I propose that the list of reasons to love each is infinite. However, it is harder and takes longer to find each reason with respect to Hitler as opposed to your spirit guide – that is another way I conceptualize that the infinites are of different sizes. Another way also to think of it is that the reasons to love both are infinite, but the reasons to love your spirit guide are more varied, whereas the reasons to love Hitler are more nuanced – I believe this also corresponds somewhat to mathematical exploration of infinites of different sizes.
To put this into more practice in the same "action-only" examples I used earlier in this thread, recall that I could find reasons to love murder, in three basic categories (1) aid in balancing the unbalanced individual (2) aid in service to self polarization (3) aid in learning about love/forgiveness for the victim. I could come up with an infinite number of permutations of those three basic lessons – I could imagine and infinite amount of unique scenarios where those three things after a murder could come into play. Thus, in that actual sense, there is an infinite amount of love, even in that moment. Perhaps the infinite is smaller than the love involved in say the birth of a child (where one could easily come up with more than three broad categories of why to love it, and then infinitely subdivide each category with specific examples as well), but it is infinite nonetheless.
I got started thinking about this theory when I started examining my own theories about how timelines are always infinite, but there are portions which may be more or less fixed. For example, many of us have things so unchangeable in our life with the current technology that the only way for our reality to change is to have some sort of improbable event – for example – I truly believe that our consciousness in other realities are exploring different paths, and in one reality I am a dictator, another a saint. However, let’s consider the reality of me becoming a dictator. It is possible for me to enter a timeline where I become a dictator, but I’m 32, so that timeline would have involved me becoming a dictator at 32 or later (barring an improbably technology like timetravel). There are still an infinite amount of ways or timelines that I could become a dictator at the age of 32 or older, but that infinity set is smaller than the infinite possibilities of me becoming a dictator from age 1.
Thus in conclusion, I can say in a sense, I love every situation, in its entirety, because every thing contains infinite love, but I can still rationally decide or prefer the situations that involves the larger infinity of love. At least, that makes sense to my rather recently awakened and ever immature 3d mind. Perhaps this creates a hierarchy of infinities, which smacks of some service to self ranking, I don’t know. But theoretically and practically speaking, you can always find endless reasons to love, but sometimes finding those reasons are of a more narrow (yet infinite) scope in some situations, rather than others. Perhaps once you join with unity, all of the seemingly different sizes of infinities will resolve themselves, I do not know. Did I mention that I can’t wait for the end of 5d??
Mad kudos to whomever had the patience to read through these random musings! okokokok time to move back to the heart already!!!