01-03-2013, 04:56 AM
Monica, why not simply ask Carla or Jim if either of them have ever heard of Gandalf's Garden, or been involved in it? They've probably never heard of it... I took a peek at the site and apparently it was a little "shop on the corner" cozy type of building right in the middle of London in the UK. It seems like it was a gathering spot for wanderers and the people who owned it published a magazine called Gandalf's Garden. The article that Artura linked (very good article in my opinion by the way :p) is from one of the issues of that magazine. It seems very love based.
http://www.pardoes.info/roanddarroll/GG.html
I also didn't find anything speaking of planned suicides or advocating the killing of one's self in order to ascend or anything like that.
As far as the validity of the Ra material, I think that this thread highlights the necessity of serious seeking, and discerning what really is true and trustworthy to you. It's one thing to read the material and believe or not believe in whatever portions strike you. There is actually no agenda in the material itself - it doesn't ask you to believe anything at all. I think this outcome is one of the main reason why Ra only spoke in question/answer format. The material is a tool for those who are ready and willing to work on themselves.
And for me personally, it holds true in the light of the experience I have when I work on myself. It's really and truly verifiable in that way. When I pay attention, I feel that I actually do have energy centers and that they do become blocked in the ways described by Ra. I actually do feel love from positive non-physical beings. I actually do have a guidance system that answers me (wow there's a right ear tone lol), and a higher self that is always with me. (I've actually been put face to face with my higher self during a drug experience, which I posted in this thread. Although I didn't post in enough detail that when I was in that void, it was my higher self in full consciousness that I was facing)
Anyway, my point is that it's verifiable to those who really have the motivation to work on themselves and take the metaphysical and spiritual very seriously.
http://www.pardoes.info/roanddarroll/GG.html
Quote:Gandalf's Garden was a shop down by the World's End in Chelsea, run by a commune of flower-children held together by Muz Murray. It flourished for a while at the high end of the Sixties, but eventually they found Chelsea too constricting and moved out to Norfolk or somewhere
I also didn't find anything speaking of planned suicides or advocating the killing of one's self in order to ascend or anything like that.
As far as the validity of the Ra material, I think that this thread highlights the necessity of serious seeking, and discerning what really is true and trustworthy to you. It's one thing to read the material and believe or not believe in whatever portions strike you. There is actually no agenda in the material itself - it doesn't ask you to believe anything at all. I think this outcome is one of the main reason why Ra only spoke in question/answer format. The material is a tool for those who are ready and willing to work on themselves.
And for me personally, it holds true in the light of the experience I have when I work on myself. It's really and truly verifiable in that way. When I pay attention, I feel that I actually do have energy centers and that they do become blocked in the ways described by Ra. I actually do feel love from positive non-physical beings. I actually do have a guidance system that answers me (wow there's a right ear tone lol), and a higher self that is always with me. (I've actually been put face to face with my higher self during a drug experience, which I posted in this thread. Although I didn't post in enough detail that when I was in that void, it was my higher self in full consciousness that I was facing)
Anyway, my point is that it's verifiable to those who really have the motivation to work on themselves and take the metaphysical and spiritual very seriously.