07-27-2017, 02:33 PM
(07-26-2017, 10:57 AM)Rybo Wrote: Hi all,
I want to preemptively apologize for a post that digs up a tired conspiracy theory, but I was just reading through a Q'uo transcript from 1/10/09 (9/11 backwards??) and came across this gem:
Q'uo: "For instance, when the Twin Towers were blasted in your city of New York in your year 2001, there were hundreds of entities who died so quickly that they were not aware of the change in their condition."
Blasted? That doesn't sound like a verb describing a plane crash or two. That sounds like something else entirely. Here's the dictionary definition of 'blast':
verb:
blow up or break apart (something solid) with explosives.
"quantities of solid rock had to be blasted away"
synonyms: blow up, bomb, blow to pieces, dynamite, shell, explode
"bombers were blasting enemy airfields"
Did Q'uo let something slip? Or are there other instances of a different narrative being offered in the material?
(Sorry, too, if this has been discussed before. I'm still fairly new to the site.)
Well anyone who doesnt/cannot see that the Twin Towers where demolished with timed explosives should review all the footage. You dont think its VERY coincidental that all the towers fell into their own footprints? And then Building 7 that wasnt even hit by a plane also collapses into its own footprint? The officials say that Building 7 caught fire and thats why it collapsed, well, if thats the case then why didnt Grenfell Tower in London that burned a few weeks ago collapse? Grenfell Tower took considerable fire damage and yet it still stands.
All three Trade Centers were clearly demolished and the people that died that day werent killed by a group of terrorists, they were murdered by a shadow element in the United States of America.