(09-25-2012, 09:21 AM)Patrick Wrote: More than that actually, because asking for proof invites negative contact.Understand that asking for proof doesn't invite negative contact. It's 'attachments' which invite negative contact. The attachments are primary with the questioning arising from the associated unconscious bias.
(09-25-2012, 09:21 AM)ShinAr Wrote:Not really. There are many people doing some time of research in the area, and as I said plenty of anecdotal evidence.(09-25-2012, 01:00 AM)zenmaster Wrote:(09-24-2012, 06:43 PM)ShinAr Wrote: You will have to point us to the proof of such experiences having been revealed to be actual interaction with deceased loved ones so that we also can benefit from that source of knowledge.One could equally ask for proof of them not being the actual interaction. And that would never be forthcoming, of course.
Which is exactly why it is not necessary to prove that the moon is or is not made of green cheese.
(09-25-2012, 09:21 AM)ShinAr Wrote: But does that mean that it is rational or intelligent for us to consider the possibility just because there is or is not an obligation to prove it?Personally, I don't get to caught up in trying to prove things which would be a waste of time for me (i.e. why mass has the property of gravity)