Dean Radin is entirely 'legit'. His background as a statician qualifies him to produce books of metadata such as The Conscious Universe. If you are familiar with the concept of metadata, you will understand that arguing with the results of well compiled metadata is arguing with the idea of the scientific method. His book explores telepathy and field consciousness with scientific studies and metadata if available while bringing up the best skeptic arguments.
An example from my more recent readings of the above book were the metadata of 5 RNGs(random number generators) during such events as the OJ Simpson trial verdict:
![[Image: radinbook.gif]](http://www.skepticreport.com/images/radinbook.gif)
My thoughts exactly. Not believing in telepathy and field consciousness while simultaneously believing in anything Ra has said(as a social memory complex, or a FIELD of several consciousnesses remotely communicating with an instrument telepathically) is a complete and utter oxymoron.
An example from my more recent readings of the above book were the metadata of 5 RNGs(random number generators) during such events as the OJ Simpson trial verdict:
![[Image: radinbook.gif]](http://www.skepticreport.com/images/radinbook.gif)
(09-21-2012, 10:25 AM)βαθμιαίος Wrote: Hard to explain the Ra material without telepathy.
My thoughts exactly. Not believing in telepathy and field consciousness while simultaneously believing in anything Ra has said(as a social memory complex, or a FIELD of several consciousnesses remotely communicating with an instrument telepathically) is a complete and utter oxymoron.