He Who Was Not

[Shin'Ar]

So frankness and a cutthroat attitude is cool now? Ok, I think that most of the comments/arguments against things 'channeled' from a much higher portion of consciousness by TheEternal and godwide_void don't add to the message at all. Some posters seem to argue every detail of these messages to the point of devil's advocacy.

I get if you don't agree/resonate with something, but why split hairs/argue symantics? It seems like odd behavior to literally argue with a channel. I picture myself barging in on a Ra/Q'uo channeling and saying to the entity "nuh-uh, I don't see it that way at all, it's this way." But seriously, where the hell did someone get the impression anyone should worship anyone? That was a completely out of the blue implication/accusation. All this disagreeing and supplying with opinions that are presented as contradictory to the post being replied to seem to muddy the overall waters of understanding.

And believe me, 3D human beings are capable of a lot more understanding than is given credit. Anyone is capable of thinning and/or removing their veil. In each of us is the One consciousness that is compartmentalized from our veiled 3D consciousness. It's like having some other infinitely more functional operating system on a seperate partition from the one being used, to borrow a computer analogy. One only needs find a way to access this partition.

That is one of the very few(only things) I disagree with Q'uo/Ra with on: that this density is not of understanding therefor nobody is capable of understanding. This was likely stated so people didn't learn so much they destabized due to not finding balance in the new knowledge utilized. This goes hand in hand with most people's interpretation of "take only what resonates with you". This is mostly said in the Ra/Q'uo material so beginners to the material won't freak out and not read/listen any further. Just because something may not be what someone doesn't want to hear doesn't mean it doesn't resonate with you. Material can still be scanned for STS influences while using discernment while agreeing whith large portions of it. Once you realize those are disclaimers, you can surpass those seeming hurdles as long as you can remain stable.

What you call argument is what I call discernment.

We could easily avoid discerning anything and just follow whoever sounds the loudest or the prettiest without any consideration at all.

But why not just become a Pentecostal if that is what one seeks.

I thought that here i n this community we were beyond such right hand seductions.

If we do not consider in detail everything that is offered, then we do not even credit those doing the offering with the consideration of taking their efforts seriously.