08-27-2012, 06:19 PM
This topic has been on my mind as of late.... and I have a few thoughts to share.
For those of you that acknowledge the presence on this planet of a secretive, negative elite that is dedicated to mind control and rule over the masses, I ask you to consider a few things about this facet of "New Age thought". Wouldn't it benefit them greatly to implant such ideas in the very segment of the population most likely to actually be aware of their presence and of a mind to do something about it? Wouldn't a philosophy that legitimizes the dark Path, teaches that something is only "evil" or "wrong" because we "perceive it that way", urges total non-judgement of any act no matter how heinous, and encourages absolute acceptance of everything "as it is" be incredibly helpful to their agenda? Does it not discourage action and aid apathy and slumber? Has religion/spirituality not been used in the past to disempower us by wrapping truth up with lies? If they can mix "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" into the same philosophy that teaches "You're all sinners who need to be saved", is it really so far-fetched to imagine mixing Oneness with moral relativism??
For those that are not ready to acknowledge or those who truly do not believe the negative elite exist, then I ask you to consider this from other angles. What would the likely effect of such a teaching be on a person in an abusive relationship? How would it affect the mentally ill or someone in a warzone? What would the likely response be if one explained to the Native Americans two hundred years ago this "there is no right or wrong" philosophy as they watched the cultural genocide and disease epidemics brought by the Europeans? What effect would the philosophy have on someone engaged in a struggle for social justice or equality within their respective society? Would such a philosophy lead to positive action, mental clarity, and balance? Or could it serve to distract, to hypnotise, and in some cases even lead to greater suffering or martyrdom?
Have we stopped to ponder the implications of this philosophy? Could it be we swalled some bad advice along with the Truth?
I accept all other-selves as beautiful and unique expressions of the One Infinite Creator, but that doesn't mean that I accept every act of violence and control that any given entity may take. I understand that their words and deeds that infringe upon the rights of others are done out of ignorance... out of a forgetting of our Oneness. So I forgive. and I Love, without reservation. Yet that love and forgiveness does not mean, however, that I see their acts as inherently neutral. Despite the fact that we live in a subjective universe and that all BEINGS are ultimately the Creator, and completely acceptable..... all acts done in ignorance or malevolence are certainly not acceptable, in my opinion. Discernment is key, and there is a difference between the Actor and the AcTION.
To accept everything blindly is not co-creation, and I view it as an abdication of my responsbility as an aspect of the Creator to not work for positive change and oppose evil acts. I will participate in this world and make ethical choices, not hypnotize myself. I know that in an ultimate sense, EVERYTHING IS OK, but I don't abdicate my responsibility to use discernment here and now. I will follow the Light I perceive, even if that means I will sometimes "judge" a word or deed as "wrong". I can look a dark being in the eye and tell them that they are loved and accepted, and sincerely mean it, while simultaneiously rejecting their "right" to violent acts towards other-selves. This is our shared reality, and as co-dreamers we do have a say about what has a place in our world and what does not. For me, that guide is what is consonant with the Law of One. We must respect the sacredness and divinity in everyone else, and our free reign ends when it violates the free will and sacredness of others.
Personally, I try to let go of judgement of other-selves, but I have absolutely no intention of letting go of my ability to discern, nor legitimizing evil acts simply because it has a new name. New Age thought has greatly expanded my understanding, but my mind is not so open that my brains have fallen out and my moral compass is still in operation. Through my Law of One study, I feel I have gained an expanded view of ethics, not an agnostic one.
Things may work differently in higher dimensions, but we are currently incarnated as humans in 3D. Just because I know I don't need scuba gear while on land, doesn't mean I will foolishly toss aside my equipment while I'm still in the murky waters of 3D.
Love to all
For those of you that acknowledge the presence on this planet of a secretive, negative elite that is dedicated to mind control and rule over the masses, I ask you to consider a few things about this facet of "New Age thought". Wouldn't it benefit them greatly to implant such ideas in the very segment of the population most likely to actually be aware of their presence and of a mind to do something about it? Wouldn't a philosophy that legitimizes the dark Path, teaches that something is only "evil" or "wrong" because we "perceive it that way", urges total non-judgement of any act no matter how heinous, and encourages absolute acceptance of everything "as it is" be incredibly helpful to their agenda? Does it not discourage action and aid apathy and slumber? Has religion/spirituality not been used in the past to disempower us by wrapping truth up with lies? If they can mix "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" into the same philosophy that teaches "You're all sinners who need to be saved", is it really so far-fetched to imagine mixing Oneness with moral relativism??
For those that are not ready to acknowledge or those who truly do not believe the negative elite exist, then I ask you to consider this from other angles. What would the likely effect of such a teaching be on a person in an abusive relationship? How would it affect the mentally ill or someone in a warzone? What would the likely response be if one explained to the Native Americans two hundred years ago this "there is no right or wrong" philosophy as they watched the cultural genocide and disease epidemics brought by the Europeans? What effect would the philosophy have on someone engaged in a struggle for social justice or equality within their respective society? Would such a philosophy lead to positive action, mental clarity, and balance? Or could it serve to distract, to hypnotise, and in some cases even lead to greater suffering or martyrdom?
Have we stopped to ponder the implications of this philosophy? Could it be we swalled some bad advice along with the Truth?
I accept all other-selves as beautiful and unique expressions of the One Infinite Creator, but that doesn't mean that I accept every act of violence and control that any given entity may take. I understand that their words and deeds that infringe upon the rights of others are done out of ignorance... out of a forgetting of our Oneness. So I forgive. and I Love, without reservation. Yet that love and forgiveness does not mean, however, that I see their acts as inherently neutral. Despite the fact that we live in a subjective universe and that all BEINGS are ultimately the Creator, and completely acceptable..... all acts done in ignorance or malevolence are certainly not acceptable, in my opinion. Discernment is key, and there is a difference between the Actor and the AcTION.
To accept everything blindly is not co-creation, and I view it as an abdication of my responsbility as an aspect of the Creator to not work for positive change and oppose evil acts. I will participate in this world and make ethical choices, not hypnotize myself. I know that in an ultimate sense, EVERYTHING IS OK, but I don't abdicate my responsibility to use discernment here and now. I will follow the Light I perceive, even if that means I will sometimes "judge" a word or deed as "wrong". I can look a dark being in the eye and tell them that they are loved and accepted, and sincerely mean it, while simultaneiously rejecting their "right" to violent acts towards other-selves. This is our shared reality, and as co-dreamers we do have a say about what has a place in our world and what does not. For me, that guide is what is consonant with the Law of One. We must respect the sacredness and divinity in everyone else, and our free reign ends when it violates the free will and sacredness of others.
Personally, I try to let go of judgement of other-selves, but I have absolutely no intention of letting go of my ability to discern, nor legitimizing evil acts simply because it has a new name. New Age thought has greatly expanded my understanding, but my mind is not so open that my brains have fallen out and my moral compass is still in operation. Through my Law of One study, I feel I have gained an expanded view of ethics, not an agnostic one.
Things may work differently in higher dimensions, but we are currently incarnated as humans in 3D. Just because I know I don't need scuba gear while on land, doesn't mean I will foolishly toss aside my equipment while I'm still in the murky waters of 3D.
Love to all
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)