Gateway to intelligent infinity

[Ankh]

And they would teach by *showing*:

Ra: I am Ra. We are not at this time incarnate among your peoples; thus, we can guide and attempt to specify, but we cannot, by example, show. This is an handicap.

Does this mean that all of Ra is in time/space (not incarnate), or that they are just not incarnate among us? I think the latter. Some of Ra is probably in space/time. That's where the balancing happens.

Ra is not incarnated among us as the sixth density mind/body/spirit complexes, but they are incarnated among us as third density mind/body complexes, i.e. Ra Wanderers.

And they would teach by *showing*:

Ra: I am Ra. We are not at this time incarnate among your peoples; thus, we can guide and attempt to specify, but we cannot, by example, show. This is an handicap.

Does this mean that all of Ra is in time/space (not incarnate), or that they are just not incarnate among us? I think the latter. Some of Ra is probably in space/time. That's where the balancing happens.

Based on observing several interactions in my life, i'm 99.995% sure that Ra has physical entities on earth 3d that are fully 6d. If that makes sense in the way that i think it does. Its very interesting.

I am sure that they and/or any other higher density beings of *both* polarities are capable of creating thought forms looking like "physical" beings of whatever form. However, there is this quote which is interesting:

The remaining part of the cycle, we have never been gone from your fifth dimension and have been working in this last minor cycle to prepare for harvest.

I've been thinking lately that maybe Ra mispoke in this sentence and meant instead third dimension or fourth dimension. Because "our" dimension is not fifth; it is first, second, third and recently fourth. But not fifth.

And they would teach by *showing*:

Ra: I am Ra. We are not at this time incarnate among your peoples; thus, we can guide and attempt to specify, but we cannot, by example, show. This is an handicap.

Says right there that they are not allowed to show.

To me it says that they can not teach/learn by showing by example because they are not incarnated in their sixth density mind/body/spirit complexes among us at this time. To not teach/learn by showing by example is an handicap.

What they would do in this case is to teach/learn:

Questioner: Thank you. If you, Ra, as an individualized entity were incarnate on Earth now with full awareness and memory of what you know now, what would be your objective at this time on Earth as far as activities are concerned?

Ra: I am Ra. The query suggests that which has been learned to be impractical. However, were we to again be naïve enough to think that our physical presence was any more effective than that love/light we send your peoples and the treasure of this contact, we would do as we did do. We would be, and we would offer our selves as teach/learners.

Yeah that's the one. Thanks!

You're welcome. I read that quote more like:

I am Ra. The query suggests that which has been learned to be impractical. However, were we to again be naïve enough to think that our physical presence was any more effective than that love/light we send your peoples and the treasure of this contact, we would do as we did do. We would be, and we would offer our selves as teach/learners.

..............................................................

To be honest, in my thinking - there is something seriously distorted with our third density planetary consciousness, which is thinking that sixth density teach/learners who could teach/learn by showing by example (the answers to this very question in this very thread for instance!) would be and has been a mistake.