08-17-2012, 01:13 PM
Woops, forgot to link it. http://www.llresearch.org/transcripts/is..._1014.aspx
@Patrick. I knew that particular set of text would be quoted by someone with the opposing viewpoint. That quote in no way supports a gradual viewpoint or any way negates the other bolded parts of this quote. Metaphysical doesn't automatically mean there will be no perceptible difference.
If anyone with a gradualistic viewpoint wants to debate this further with me, they will need to directly adress this quote:
"Indeed, the Mayans end time is in 2012, at the Winter Solstice. This is an accurate assessment of the movement of the planet itself into the Age of Aquarius."
I'm pretty damn sure having time Dec 20th and NO TIME December 21st on forward will be a perceptible difference.
@Patrick. I knew that particular set of text would be quoted by someone with the opposing viewpoint. That quote in no way supports a gradual viewpoint or any way negates the other bolded parts of this quote. Metaphysical doesn't automatically mean there will be no perceptible difference.
If anyone with a gradualistic viewpoint wants to debate this further with me, they will need to directly adress this quote:
"Indeed, the Mayans end time is in 2012, at the Winter Solstice. This is an accurate assessment of the movement of the planet itself into the Age of Aquarius."
I'm pretty damn sure having time Dec 20th and NO TIME December 21st on forward will be a perceptible difference.