What is difference between intelligent infinity and intelligent energy

[anagogy]

Ra uses these phrases as 2 different "things." Of course, there is only unity. I want to understand why Ra felt it necessary to talk about intelligent unity and intelligent energy separately and distinctly of each other.

------------------------------------------------------------

80.22 Questioner: Then by this contact also with intelligent energy can you give me an example of what this would be for both the contact with intelligent infinity and the contact with intelligent energy? Could you give me an example of what type of experience this would result in, if that is at all possible?

Ra: I am Ra. This shall be the last query of this working of full length. We have discussed the possibilities of contact with intelligent energy, for this energy is the energy of the Logos, and thus it is the energy which heals, builds, removes, destroys, and transforms all other-selves as well as the self.

The contact with intelligent infinity is most likely to produce an unspeakable joy in the entity experiencing such contact. If you wish to query in more detail upon this subject, we invite you to do so in another working. Is there a brief query before we close this working?

------------------------------------------------------------

27.5 Questioner: It is not necessary to divide it. The definition of intelligent infinity is sufficient. Could you define that please?

Ra: I am Ra. This is exponentially simpler and less confusing. There is unity. This unity is all that there is. This unity has a potential and kinetic. The potential is intelligent infinity. Tapping this potential will yield work. This work has been called by us, intelligent energy.

The nature of this work is dependent upon the particular distortion of free will which in turn is the nature of a particular intelligent energy or kinetic focus of the potential of unity or that which is all.

------------------------------------------------------------

27.7 Questioner: Then I think I have extracted an important point from this in that in intelligent infinity we have work without polarity, or a potential difference does not have to exist. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. There is no difference, potential or kinetic, in unity. The basic rhythms of intelligent infinity are totally without distortion of any kind. The rhythms are clothed in mystery, for they are being itself. From this undistorted unity, however, appears a potential in relation to intelligent energy.

In this way you may observe the term to be somewhat two-sided, one use of the term, that being as the undistorted unity, being without any kinetic or potential side. The other application of this term, which we use undifferentiatedly for lack of other term in the sense of the vast potential tapped into by foci or focuses of energy, we call intelligent energy.

------------------------------------------------------------

Essentially, to summarize, "intelligent energy" is a kind of kinetic focus. A tapping of infinite potential to do work of some kind, it being universal in application.

"Intelligent Infinity" is basically undistorted unity or oneness. It is infinite potential energy, though, as Ra so dutifully notes, in unity there is no distinction between potential and kinetic. There only appears to be a difference relative to a particular kinetic illusion. So when a particular illusion is invested in, a sort of duality appears where there is a kinetic focus, and in relation to that kinetic focus, a reservoir of untapped infinite potential energy -- intelligent infinity.

Much as there can really be no positive polarity without the negative polarity to define it, in unity there can be no potential, without the kinetic to define it.

In unity there is no difference between potential, or kinetic. It is totally undistorted. I would even go further to say that their is no difference between the "probable" and the "actual". Such distinctions are only made by those, such as us, entrenched within the illusion.