07-03-2012, 08:54 AM
(07-02-2012, 09:56 PM)plenum Wrote: found this here: http://www.spiritofra.com/Ra-section%201.htm
Quote:RA: When the magical personality is properly invoked the self has invoked its Higher Self. Thus a bridge between space/time and time/space is made and the 6th density magical personality experiences directly the 3rd density catalyst for the duration of the working. It is most central to deliberately take off the magical personality after the working in order that the Higher Self may resume its appropriate function as your Higher Self operating in many realms, not just in the 3rd density. (B3, 192)
QUESTION: The 3 aspects of the magical personality are stated to be power, love and wisdom. Are these its only primary aspects? (B3, 192)
RA: The magical personality is a being of unity, a being of 6th density, and the equivalent of what you call your Higher Self and at the same time is a personality enormously rich in variety of experience and subtlety of emotion. (B3, 192)
and more quotes here: http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?q=m...0&ss=1&o=s
this one here about Invocations and Evocations is still confusing to me.
Quote:73.7 The second station is the evocation of the great cross of life. This is an extension of the magical personality to become the Creator. Again, all invocations and evocations are drawn through the violet energy center. This may then be continued towards whatever energy centers are desired to be used.
I have considered what Ra has to say in thisn regard and the quotes which I have read from that site have confirmed that which I have already suspected fro some time now.
Ra is not always passing on accurate information. This is their opinion on a matter no different than you or I having an opinion on a matter. And in this case Ra would not be accurate in its speculation about the Higher Self.
Ra is suggesting on one hand that the Higher Self is actually just the result of the many possible outcomes that our consciousness might have in the future, and that it can influence and direct us in assistance, and then on the other hand it states clearly that any such influence would be a breach of free will. This is a contradiction in my opinion.
QUESTION: Then the Higher Self operates from the future as we understand things, and it would know, as far as I am concerned, what was going to happen. Is this correct? (B2, 64)
RA: This is incorrect, as it would he a violation of free will. The Higher Self is aware of the lessons learned through 6th density. The choices which must be made to achieve the Higher Self, as it is now, must be made by the mind/spirit/body complex itself.
Thus the Higher Self is like a map on which the destination is known and the roads are shown, and the traveler has already reached the destination in some universe, maybe this one. The Higher Self at the destination looks back on the way that has been traveled and assists the traveler in arriving at the goal in an easier way.
So the Higher Self can program the entity for certain lessons and predisposing limitations, but the rest is up to the free choice of the entity. (B2, 64)
If it is programming the lower self, than it is influencing in such a way as to breach its free will.
There is only one way that this makes sense to me and that is if Ra is speaking of the Higher Self not as one particular individual consciousness, but as the All, or as Intelligent Energy, which may be what Siren was picking up on.
IMHO, the Higher Self is the evolved consciousness, which has not yet come to pass, except that in infinity all is Mystery and continues to evolve into Mystery.
Our higher self is realized by evolving into it, not by it regressing to assist us in that evolution.
My Higher Self is here and now, and that which I shall become as I evolve.
So I must assume that Ra is either incorrect in its speculation or that it means something other than what it seems to mean in these quotes.