12-28-2009, 07:53 AM
(12-27-2009, 06:26 PM)Peregrinus Wrote: I notice you account for two spirals. How do you account for the third spiral? There are two white and one blue if you look at the photos.It only has force in one direction in this case the blue spiral does not produce much thrust. And you say 3 spirals, but I only count 2. Can you refer me to an image where there are three spirals?
Secondly, what about it spinning for 15 minutes? This rocket would have had to maintain a straight trajectory for that long in order for the spirals to remain concentric as they were. I would think that a rocket which had energy/force in three directions... might alter course?
If the two white spirals are very close and not at an 180 degrees angle it might actually support the idea that part of the engine got stuck inside the beam splitting it in two, deflecting it in two directions as opposed to just bent where I was working from. However, if the angle of separation is close to 180 degrees then that's becoming unlikely.
(12-27-2009, 07:03 PM)transiten Wrote: Just to add some more fuel to the debate: Go to the comments at the end of the E-book and read nr 13; the one from tspell...Hah, I had located Skjervoy myself and used it to calculate distance and size It's not actually hard since the original news articles literally named the place. (My Norwegian geography is not THAT good ) The lesersbild image comes from a harbor in Skjervoy. Unfortunately google maps shows little detail for the area, but the mountain in the photograph is visible. The direction of the spiral is exactly the direction of the white sea.
Quote:..and Ali i must have mercuryretrogrademisunderstood you , i'm oversensitive from pple debunking astrology..It was not my intention to do so transiten. I must be more clear in the future.
For the record, Mercury IS retrograde right now isn't it?