1990.09.23 - 2nd density vehicles; list of diseases / their cause

[Siren]

if the 3D make-up is that of a 3D entity inhabiting a 2D body,

Let me try to elucidate a little bit, if I may (do forgive me; this will be a lengthy post):

The 3D entity "inhabits" a 3D body. Part of what constitutes being a 3D entity is having a 3D body.

4D then utilizes a 4D body; 5D a 5D body, and so on.

Another factor is, what exactly characterizes the various levels of physical vehicles native to higher densities? A 2D body is fairly easy to comprehend, but what is a specific 3D body?

The vehicular form you are using right now in 3D (space/time, particularly).

in the event that this linking is exclusive only to the 3D and no other density beyond ours, which would make sense given that those beings of 2D and 3D co-exist with one another and thus conceiving that we (3D) were designed to be the final plateau of experience for 2D beings who reached a high level of evolution and act in mutual assistance with one another

What makes you think 4D entities do not interact with 3D?
Or that 5D do not interact with 4D (in a very physical sense)?

then this would entail that in densities which make use of a physical vehicle, the density level of each being is set at one particular density; 4D beings have 4D bodies, 5D beings have 5D bodies, etc.

This is so.

If this is so, then herein lies a key question necessary to further grasp all of this:

What defines a 4D/5D/6D body? There also exists one crucial anomaly: what defines a 3D body, and does such a thing even exist, and if so, when and where does it become implemented?

3D body becomes implemented in 3D. Same for the rest. Each body being analogous to the density being experienced.

If 3D beings do not actually have 3D bodies but reside within a 2D being,

Herein lies the "problematic," or the confusion.

Let us then examine the lower bodies, beginning with those of 1D, moving to the more refined 3D body, and thus diminish this confusion somewhat:

The 1D body is elemental/chemical/mineral; random in nature (i.e. its motion/change/flux not being self-directed), and quite formless—then again, even formlessness is a sort of form. These are the entities of the the red-spectrum density, the so-called earth/water and air/fire elements. Thus, bodies of earth or water (such as oceans and rivers and mountains and meadows) are entities of the 1st density. Awareness is in it them, moves in them; yet they do not have a "central" awareness so to speak, and they cannot be quantified in number as other entities can be—that is, you can't really say a mountain is "an" entity in itself, and two mountains are "two" entities. In other words, earth is earth (and yes, there are different "types" of "earth-ness" and combination of elements, but the point I'm trying to make is: a grain of sand is not an entity—"sand-ness" on the other hand, would be more like it).

Then, the 2D body is that which begins to take a form upon itself; it gathers focus, it individualizes, it distinguishes itself apart from the homogeneous mass of 1D; it is capable of focusing sufficient awareness to become, well, sufficiently aware so as to become self-mobile; self-aware. The first bodies of the orange-vibratory spectrum begin as those entities called "unicellular organisms." The more advanced 2D bodies are those of higher 2D animal/vegetal lifeforms; predominantly the animal-type. The 2D entity seeks to grow, reproduce and propagate. Hence, the bodies of 2D entities are diverse and varied (and remember that there are 7 sub-densities within each density, so a ladybug does not "house" the same level of awareness as a horse). This is one of the main purposes of 2D: a diverse viability of bodies.

2D bodies are, basically, what scientists would call "organic;" whereas 1D bodies would be considered "inorganic" (who would have though that there was life in "rock-ness" and "water-ness," right?). This is however, somewhat correct, in the sense that 2D bodies are "organized" matter out of the primordial matter/elements (1D), which is "disorganized" in its randomness and dissolution.

The 3D body then is that body appropriate to and characteristic of an entity of 3D awareness. The 3D body mirrors this awareness; it is compatible with it; thus this body allows the entity to continue its seeking towards greater knowing of the self. It is the perfect tool for a 3D experience. It is in 3D when the entity begins to seek higher/inwards, and the concept of "spirit" begins to be conceptualized. But once again, there are 7 sub-densities to 3D entities, and not all entities are at the same grade (hence, there are "lesser" and "higher" 3D bodies, just as in 2D and all other densities, congruent with the level of growth of each entity).

I would leave room for further questioning at this point. If this has all made sense thus far, I may continue with the higher/finer bodies of densities 4 and above.

then is there a point where we develop 3D bodies?

Let us consider for a moment how the human body is transmuted into a fully-fledged 3D entity. Before the human body is "formed," it is water/earth and air/fire inside the womb of its progenitor. This is a 1D body. As this elemental substance gathers form unto itself, the 2D body is made manifest (i.e. the fetus and its following stages). As the fetus grows and moves in awareness it reaches a point in which the 3D-level of awareness is "awakened" (or the potential for 3D awareness goes into activation). Then the 3D human body has been completely made, and the creature is birthed into the 3D environment proper.

You might then imagine that 4D bodies follow similar patterns of reproduction. And this is so. Just remember that higher bodies are much more refined and become finer and finer the more they are evolved. Pretty much the same way 3D bodies are the refinement and "upgrade" of 2D bodies (or 2nd density matter/material).

Yet I do recall reading in Ra's discourse that the 3D being is completely incompatible with the energetic field of 4D;

Indeed. Would you (3D consciousness) be able to "inhabit" a 1D body and maintain your 3D awareness? Or is a 2D lion compatible with 3D experience in the city, or should it rather remain in the jungle? Therein lies the incompatibility.

is he referring to the 3D consciousness or is there a chance that a 3D physical vehicle would be able to exist in 4D only in the case that it was imbued with a 4D consciousness?

If that were to happen, then the 3D body would transmute into a 4D body. As was the case of 2D bodies naturally transmuting into 3D bodies over a period of time due to the growing expansion in consciousness of the 2D entities (I even imagine right prior/during/after this transition there were 2D/3D dual activated bodies; i.e. bodies being 2D 7th sub-density 7, 3D 1st sub-density).

If a 3D vehicle is used, what would set it apart from a 2D vehicle beyond its self-awareness,

The body is inexorably tied to the mind/awareness. We can barely speak of bodies without the mental characteristics and processes that accompany them.

However, it's not just a matter of awareness. It's a matter of physical functionality. The body is a vehicle, tool, instrument of exploration and expression for, and of, the mind. Look about yourself and observe the various artificial/artistic constructions/manifestations of 3D entities: buildings of brick, steel and granite; clothing of diverse texture, fabric, shape and color; mechanical vehicles of transportation; televisions, cellphones, computers; bellicose weapons; and other machineries and technological gadgetry. The list goes on and on.

Could this all have been manufactured with the body of an elephant or an alligator?

It's not just the awareness so invested into the 3D physical vehicle that allows these manifestations, it is the physical design and capabilities of the body itself. Everything is refined in the human body. Just look at it for a moment.

There is quite a giant leap between the 2D body and the 3D body. The human creature is an amazing thing (it's a shame not many realize this).
Now, one may wonder and say, "Aha! But then why does the human being resemble so much the animal/primate?"

Well, you might as well ask why a 4D "insectoid" resemble so much a mantis. The original genetic configurations are carried over over the densities; holding less sway and less sway as one reaches higher densities.

The 2D entity cannot modify its physical shell at will.

The 3D entity begins to modify the body: he has surgery, genetic alteration, and may use artificial implants.

The 4D takes this even further. 4D being the middle-density; right between the lower and the higher; physical and metaphysical; space/time and time/space.

By the time 5D is reached, much is done by thought/imagination alone.

6D then, having such a subtle light material for its illusion, takes any form it wants that may suit its 6D awareness necessities (hence the term, "the form-maker," as Ra has often called it).

OK, I've carried myself away. Hope this is not too baffling for anyone. I do not wish to be a stepping stone (unless it serves you to step up instead of trip down!).