2012, some confusion!

[Siren]

Most people have daily obligations to contend with like work and taking care of family.

There are no "obligations." There are only choices. To be "obliged" presupposes you don't really have a choice, or that some external command is overriding your freewill to make your own decisions. Truth is, you put yourself under that "obligation."

You can, at any time, "snap free" out of any "obligation" by making a different choice. Or turn any "obligation" into an opportunity, by seeing it as such.

What would you personally do if you had been one of those rare people who due to being retired was able to have invested 10,000 hours, or more over a 10 year period and you actually managed to deduce enough of the reality puzzle to determine that an impending catastrophic global change, or event was going to result in billions of deaths?

Well, I'm pretty sure one can achieve as much (and so much more even) in less than 2 years and while still in high school.

And to answer your questions, if I became aware of an event that would result in billions or trillions or a gazillion of deaths, I would celebrate. Death, birth, life. Always reason to celebrate.

PS: I, personally, am not concerned with numbers, really.

PS2: Besides, there's only One of us here.

Your certain of it by virtue of ten long years of collecting the right bits of information and ruling out vast swaths of disinformation thereby allowing you to see a proper analysis that those other seekers who are at a disadvantage from the lack of sheer numbers of years that it that it takes to incubate a proper realization.

Funny. The amount of years one spends reading books (or the amount of books, for that matter) doesn't necessarily equate to a more "advantageous" position or vantage point. It's all a matter of awareness. Some seekers (including "wanderers") come in already aware of many things, with an easier ability to inform themselves via the resources of intuition, insight, dreams, epiphanies, etc; as well as establishing certain "contact" with non-3D sources. I mean, literally.

By your logic, it looks as if each humans entity is born with a blank slate of mind each time it was re-incarnated and all the awareness it had accrued throughout its evolutionary journey is voided as he has to start all over again from scratch on each incarnation.

This is not the case. For if it were so, all humans would still be primates.

PS: The more you are aligned with the vibration of "truth," the easier it'll be to detect/discern disinfo and the such.

Tip? Translate fear into love (they are the same energy/emotion at different frequency) and as a result, you will attract/reflect the like.

Worse is you realize how impossible it would be to convince people because they lack the background knowledge and have their minds polluted with reams of disinformation on top of their ignorance.

Ah, "convincing" people. To convince is contradictory to the purpose of learning and evolving naturally, because if one be ready, one would not need be convinced of anything. All learn and evolve at their own pace, rate and timing.

To seek to convince others is to attempt to "prove" things to others. Nothing can be proven except by the self. So there's no need for going on a missionary frenzy to preach anything (well, except for scientific and religious fanatics and the such). That is why professing is left to professors, professionals and prof(ph)ets.

Now, why would you be so frustrated about the "ignorance" of the people but don't mind the "ignorance" of, let's say, a rock, which is far less consciously evolved and is taking thousands and thousands of years to learn its lessons?

Nobody is at a "disadvantage," really.

Again, all are learning at their own pace, rate and timing.