Going to fourth density? Or fifth?

[Steppingfeet]

As far as I'm aware, I haven't seen this discussed much in the forum...

What about all these sources now saying that the earth is headed to fifth density, rather than fourth? Simply different terminology? Did we "jump a timeline"? Or skip ahead? Have we unknowingly been in fourth density yet in some kind of 3D matrix program? All just a bunch of BS?

I think you would have to depart from Ra's cosmic narrative to work with a system that says we are moving into the "fifth" density or dimension.

Apples and oranges - I don't think there is any reconciling the two streams of thought.

Gary That is not quite fair.
Who says that Ra is providing a narrative?
Ra provides philosophy - we decide on the narrative.
This is a fairly basic concept.
Both apples and oranges are fruit my friend.
Why do you keep moving my threads?

I get tired of my own words sometimes and endeavor to say things differently. By "cosmic narrative" I mean only to indicate Ra's cosmology.

Narrative is applicable word, I think. Ra tells a story of eight densities, the eighth being the first of the next octave. They tell a story of infinity and finity, unity and manyness, polarity and the veil, chakras and activations/blockages, mind/body/spirit complexes and forms of service and seeking.

I happen to agree with that story. I happen to think it the closest representation oftruth I've personally encountered in words. But in a pluralistic world, I have to recognize that it is one cosmology among others.

Sometimes different cosmologies can be reconciled one with the other, sometimes the discrepancy is too much - you have to abandon one to work with the other, or at least abandon aspects of one to work with aspects of the other. Or, you hold conflicting views simultaneously, accepting each, somehow, as equally valid on their own terms. Thus my point regarding apples and oranges. Yes in the real world apples and oranges are both fruit, but the expression "apples and oranges" conveys two categorically different items that are difficult to relate.

That's my opinion. Maybe a system of thought which says we are moving into a fifth dimension/density, and a system of thought which says we move sequentially through densities/dimensions and now move from third to fourth, can be reconciled. I dunno Ashim.

Regarding your final question, why do you post threads in forums where they don't quite belong? Why don't you ask me this question via PM in response to the PM I sent you explaining the recently moved thread? : )

Much love.