(04-02-2012, 02:38 PM)TheEternal Wrote: Is "Riad" supposed to be "Triad"?
I understand what you are getting at, that there must have been a sort of "beginning" to the chain reaction which produced the state of our current society, and that following as you say of Ra, there must be an entity involved.
However, herein I would perhaps define entity not by an individuated soul fragment, but as a collective entity consisting of multiple individuated portions. Remember, Ra doesn't see us as separate.
No riad.
You are correct that the entity has omniprecence within the social memory complex but it (he) is also one individual entity, by definition. As you reminded us from Ra, we are all things.
(04-02-2012, 02:34 PM)Ali Quadir Wrote:Nice that you are back here Ali.(04-02-2012, 12:06 PM)Ashim Wrote:It is okay... We don't need to agree. You asked me for proof I gave you an appropriate response. If you wish to leave it at that then that's okay for me. You probably saved us both a lot of time right?Quote:It is incompatible with the idea of co-creators.
Ok Ali. I tend to disagree with most of your views and to be honest it's ok for me to leave it at that.
