Free Will - Confused

[thefool]

Hi everyone,

As we know, something Ra and Q'uo are determined to do is maintain our free will by not giving us information that would alter our evolution in any way... The information given is always open to be interpreted in whatever way we chose to interpret it, because each individual must have the ability to make whatever choices they want for themselves. For example, although it would no doubt be easy for Q'uo to do, he/she/they would never give us the results of tomorrow's rugby match, because even something as non-relevant as that with regards to our evolution would have profound implications on how we move forward. (In a similar way that characters in sci-fi movies are oh so careful not to make any changes when they go back in time, less they significantly impact the present and future).

This is all and well, but I guess I just still don't quite understand. How can these entities give us ANY information at all, without violating our free will? I mean, the information is certainly, certainly welcome beyond all the means that I could express. I think the information has been crucial to the spiritual development of who knows how many people. But there's the paradox, we're changing the way we think and do things based on what's given. Even if it's a good thing, isn't it a violation of free will? Or are these entities not in violation because we have chosen to read the material, or made a request for it on an unconscious level? (hope I haven't just answered my own question there). If the Ra material suddenly came up in all the top newspapers in the world, would that then be the free will violation?

The other confusing part of the free will idea is how Q'uo sort of passes off the free will responsibility on to the reader. At the start of most sessions Q'uo asks that we use our judgment on what is said, so that they might speak more freely. We should hold on to what resonates, and discard what does not. What does this imply, exactly? Q'uo tells us what they know to be the truth, which we can probably assume is almost always accurate coming from their position compared to ours. If I read something that does not resonate, how can I know that it is not true, vs. something that I am simply not comfortable with? For example, there are a lot of things I see in the news that I am not comfortable with (and some times can hardly believe), yet I won't deny that they aren't happening or true. Am I perhaps thinking about this the wrong way?

Very interested to hear your thoughts. And I have to add that I'm simply overjoyed that we have this forum to chat these things up with!

Very interesting questions!!! I have myself been struggling to understand their use of this term and what it means. In a broader sense, How can any entity violate another's free will. Free will is NOT something that can be given or taken. It is the very core of our existence. It is the first distortion that started it all.

But it can be looked at from two perspective. They might be breaking the 'law of confusion' for sure as we have allowed oversleves to be placed in this veiled 3rd density. This will also be their learning on our behalf as we wanted to come to earth to gain polarity and learn certain stuff (besides helping or conquering of course). It will be like someone telling you the end of a suspense movie while you want to enjoy the movie (it might be very tempting to knwo the answer though). So in that way they might be impeding our progress and coming in the path of our free will choice. I think the key is the term Violate or the Infringement. They don't want to step on our toes. And that is all another entity can do in big scheme of things. spoil your fun